Peer-to-Peer Traced Execution of Composite Services

  • Marie-Christine Fauvet
  • Marlon Dumas
  • Boualem Benatallah
  • Hye-Young Paik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2193)


The connectivity generated by the Internet is opening unprecedented opportunities of automating business-to-business collaborations. As a result, organisations of all sizes are forming online alliances in order to deliver integrated value-added services. Unfortunately, due to a lack of tools and methodologies offering an adequate level of abstraction, the development of these integrated services is currently ad hoc and requires a considerable effort of low-level programming, especially when dealing with coordination, communication, and execution tracing issues. In this paper, we present a framework through which business services can be declaratively composed, and the resulting composite services can be executed in a fully traceable manner. The traces of a composite service executions are collected incrementally through peer-to-peer interactions between the involved providers. Once collected, these traces are stored as linked objects in distributed repositories, which are made available for auditing, customer feedback and quality assessment.


Service Composition Composite Service Business Process Management State Coordinator Trace Execution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Benatallah, M. Dumas, M.-C. Fauvet, and H.-Y. Paik. Self-coordinated and self-traced composite services with dynamic provider selection. Technical report, The University of New South Wales, School of Computer Science & Engineering, 2001. Available at Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Benatallah, B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, A. Elmagarmid, and J. Beard. Composing and maintaining web-based virtual enterprises. In Workshop on Technologies for E-Services, Cairo, Egypt, September 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Casati, S. Ilnicki, L.-J. Jin, V. Krishnamoorthy, and M.-C. Shan. Adaptive and dynamic service composition in eFlow. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Stockholm, Sweden, June 2000. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Q. Chen and M. Hsu. Inter-enterprise collaborative business process management. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Heidelberg, Germany, April 2001. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Harel and A. Naamad. The STATEMATE semantics of statecharts. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(4):293–333, October 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Internet RFC-1305. Network Time Protocol Specification Version 3.
  7. 7.
    P. Koksal, S.N. Arpinar, and A. Dogac. Workflow history management. SIGMOD Record, 27(1):67–75, January 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Leymann and D. Roller. Production Workflow: Concepts and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Muth, J. Weissenfels, M. Gillmann, and G. Weikum. Workflow history management in virtual enterprises using a lightweight workflow management system. In Proc. of the Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE). IEEE Press, March 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Muth, D. Wodtke, J. Weissenfels, A.K. Dittrich, and G. Weikum. From centralized workflow specification to distributed workflow execution. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2), March 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language reference manual. Addison-Wesley, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Schuster, D. Georgakopoulos, A. Cichocki, and D. Baker. Modeling and composing service-based and reference process-based multi-enterprise processes. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Stockholm, Sweden, June 2000. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    SQLData. Simple Object Access Protocol.
  14. 14.
    Sun Microsystems Inc. Enterprise JavaBeans Specifications.
  15. 15.
    Sun Microsystems Inc. Java RMI.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Christine Fauvet
    • 1
  • Marlon Dumas
    • 2
  • Boualem Benatallah
    • 1
  • Hye-Young Paik
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science & EngineeringThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Cooperative Information Systems Research CentreQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations