Implicit Culture for Multi-agent Interaction Support

  • Enrico Blanzieri
  • Paolo Giorgini
  • Paolo Massa
  • Sabrina Recla
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2172)

Abstract

Implicit Culture is the relation between a set and a group of agents such that the elements of the set behave according to the culture of the group. Earlier work claimed that supporting Implicit Culture phenomena can be useful in both artificial and human agents. In this paper, we recall the concept of Implicit Culture, present an implementation of a System for Implicit Culture Support (SICS) for multi-agent systems, and show how to use it for supporting agent interaction. We also present the application of the SICS to the eCulture Brokering System, a multi-agent system designed to mediate access to cultural information.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Aiello, P. Busetta, A. Donà, and L. Serafini. Ontological overhearing. In Proc. of 8th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 2001), Seattle, USA, 2001. 35Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Blanzieri and P. Giorgini. From collaborative filtering to implicit culture. In Proc. of the Workshop on Agents and Reccomender Systems, in Agents2000, Barcellona (http://www.science.unitn.it/?pgiorgio/ic), 2000. 28, 29, 30, 31, 35
  3. 3.
    E. Blanzieri, P. Giorgini, and F. Giunchiglia. Implicit culture and multiagent systems. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Infrastructure for Electronic Business, Science, and Education on the Internet, L’Aquila-Italy (http://www.science.unitn.it/?pgiorgio/ic), 2000. 28, 29
  4. 4.
    P. Busetta, R. Rönnquist, A. Hodgson, and A. Lucas. Jack intelligent agents-components for intelligent agents in java. Technical Report TR9901, AOSs, January. http://www.jackagents.com/pdf/tr9901.pdf. 35
  5. 5.
    P. Busetta, L. Serafini, D. Singh, and F. Zini. Extending multi-agent cooperation by overhearing. In Proc. the Sixth International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS 2001), Trento, Italy, 2001. 35Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Decker, K. Sycara, and M. Williamson. Matchmaking and brokering. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Multi-agents Systems (ICMAS-96), 1996. 27Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FIPA. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. http://www.fipa.org. 31
  8. 8.
    D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12):61–70, 1992. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. A. Konstan, B. N. Miller, D. Maltz, J. L. Herlocker, L. R. Gordon, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77–87, 1997. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Sycara and D. Zeng. Multi-agent integration of information gathering and decision support. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1996. 27Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Weiss. Multiagent Systems. A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, 1999. 27Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10 (2), 1995. 27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Blanzieri
    • 1
    • 3
  • Paolo Giorgini
    • 2
  • Paolo Massa
    • 1
  • Sabrina Recla
    • 1
  1. 1.ITC-irst TrentoItaly
  2. 2.Dep. of MathematicsUniversity of TrentoItaly
  3. 3.Dep. of PsychologyUniversity of TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations