Advertisement

Opportunistic Prioritised Clustering Framework (OPCF)

  • Zhen He
  • Alonso Márquez
  • Stephen Blackburn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1944)

Abstract

Ever since the ‘early days’ of database management systems, clustering has proven to be one of the most effective performance enhan- cement techniques for object oriented database management systems. The bulk of the work in the area has been on static clustering algorithms which re-cluster the object base when the database is static. However, this type of re-clustering cannot be used when 24-hour database access is required. In such situations dynamic clustering is required, which allows the object base to be reclustered while the database is in operation. We believe that most existing dynamic clustering algorithms lack three im- portant properties. These include: the use of opportunism to imposes the smallest I/O footprint for re-organisation; the re-use of prior research on static clustering algorithms; and the prioritisation of re-clustering so that the worst clustered pages are re-clustered first. In this paper, we present OPCF, a framework in which any existing static clustering algorithm can be made dynamic and given the desired properties of I/O opportunism and clustering prioritisation. In addition, this paper presents a perfor- mance evaluation of the ideas suggested above.The main contribution of this paper is the observation that existing static clustering algorithms, when transformed via a simple transformation framework such as OPCF, can produce dynamic clustering algorithms that out-perform complex existing dynamic algorithms, in a variety of situations. This makes the solution presented in this paper particularly attractive to real OODBMS system implementers who often prefer to opt for simpler solutions.

Keywords

Cluster Algorithm Object Base Dynamic Cluster Object Graph Cluster Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ailamaki, A., Dewitt, D. J., Hill, M. D., and Wood, D. A. Dbmss on a modern processor: Where does time go? In The 25th VLDB conference, Edinburgh, Scotland (September 1999), pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banerjee, J., Kim, W., Kim, S. J., and Garza, J. F. Clustering a dag for cad databases. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (November 1988), vol. 14, pp. 1684–1699.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bullat, F. Regroupement dynamique dojets dans les bases de donnees. PhD thesis, Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand II, France, January 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darmont, J., Petit, B., and Schneider, M. Ocb: A generic benchmark to evaluate the performances of object-oriented database systems. In International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT) (Valencia Spain, March 1998), LNCS Vol. 1377 (Springer), pp. 326–340.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darmont, J., and Schneider, M. Voodb: A generic discrete-event random simulation model to evaluate the performances of oodbs. In The 25th VLDB conference, Edinburgh, Scotland (September 1999), pp. 254–265.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drew, P., King, R., and Hudson, S. E. The performance and utility of the cactis implementation algorithms. In 16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 13-16 Aug. 1990), D. McLeod, R. Sacks-Davis, and H.-J. Schek, Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerlhof, A., Kemper, A., and Moerkotte, G. On the cost of monitoring and reorganization of object bases for clustering. In ACM SIGMOD Record (1996), vol. 25, pp. 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerlhof, C., Kemper, A., Kilger, C., and Moerkotte, G. Partition-based clustering in object bases: From theory to practice. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Foundations of Data Organisation and Algorithms (FODO) (1993).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, Z., Marquez, A., and Blackburn, S. Opportunistic prioritised clustering framework. Tech. rep., The Australian National University, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hudson, E., and King, R. Cactis: A self-adaptive, concurrent implementation of an object-oriented database management system. In ACM Transactions on Database Systems (September 1989), pp. 291–321.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kernighan, B., and Lin, S. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell System Technical Journal (1970), 291–307.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knafla, N. Prefetching Techniques for Client/Server, Object-Oriented Database Systems. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lakhamraju, M., Rastogi, R., Seshadri, S., and Sudarshan, S. On-line reorganisation in object databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD conference on Management of Data May 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McIver, W. J. J., and King, R. Self-adaptive, on-line reclustering of complex object data. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 24-27, 1994 (1994), R. T. Snodgrass and M. Winslett, Eds., ACM Press, pp. 407–418.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsangaris, E.-M. M. Principles of Static Clustering For Object Oriented Data-bases. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wietrzyk, V. S., and Orgun, M. A. Dynamic reorganisation of object data-bases. In Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium August 1999, IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yue, P. C., and Wong, C. K. On the optimality of the probability ranking scheme in storage applications. JACM 20, 4 (October 1973), 624–633.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhen He
    • 1
  • Alonso Márquez
    • 1
  • Stephen Blackburn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations