Trade-Offs between Inductive Power and Logical Omniscience in Modeling Context

  • Horacio Arló Costa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2116)


In a series of recent papers the economist Michael Bacharach [2] has pointed out that most approaches in knowledge representation suffer from two complementary defects. Typically they assume that agents know all the logical consequences of information encoded in a finite knowledge base (Cleverness) and only these consequences (Cloistered-ness). In this article we develop first-order and inductive extensions of Montague-Scott’s semantics in order to tackle both problems at once. Three desiderata are put forward for representing epistemic context: (1) expressive adequacy, (2) inductive power, (3) boundedness. An important part of our effort focuses on reconsidering the role of standard formalisms (both logical and probabilistic) in representing the information of bounded agents.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arló-Costa, H., First order extensions of classical systems of modal logic: the role of the Barcan schemas, forthcoming in Studia Logica.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.O.L. Bacharach. ‘The epistemic structure of a theory of a game,’ in M.O.L. Bacharach, L.-A. Gérard-Varet, P. Mongin and H.S. Shin (eds.), Epistemic Logic and the theory of Games and Decisions, Boston, Dordrecht, London, 303–345, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.F. Chellas. Modal logic: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.E. Jr. Kyburg. Probability and the logic of rational belief Wesleyan University Press. Middletown, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.E. Jr. Kyburg. ‘Probabilistic inference and non-monotonic inference,’ Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, R.D Schachter, T.S. Evitt, L.N. Kanal J.F. Lemmer (eds.), Elsevier Science (North Holland), 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isaac Levi. The Enterprise of Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Montague. ‘Universal Grammar,’ Theoria 36, 373–98, 1970.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert Moore. Logic and Representation, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 39, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Scott ‘Advice in modal logic,’ K. Lambert (Ed.) Philosophical Problems in Logic Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, 143–73, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robert Stalnaker. ‘A note on non-monotonic modal logic,’ Artificial Intelligence 64, 183–196, 1993.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ariel Rubinstein. Lectures on Modeling Bounded Rationality, Core Lecture Series, Louvain-La-Neuve, Universite Catholique de Louvain, reprinted by MIT Press (1998), 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horacio Arló Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations