Experiences in the Development of an Agent Architecture

  • Geoff Bush
  • Martin Purvis
  • Stephen Cranefield
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1881)


The current interest in agent-based software development has increased the demand for agent architectures upon which to build agent-based systems. While several agent architectures have been made publicly available, work in this area is not by any means finished—there are still many reasons to research new agent architectures. Although development of an agent architecture has been identified as a difficult process, little has been written about the issues involved—this contributes to the difficulty of the process. It is important for future agent architecture development that such issues be identified and widely discussed so that common pitfalls are not repeatedly encountered. This paper outlines the development of a new agent architecture and discusses experiences gained while using it to develop a prototype for the New Zealand Distributed Information Systems project. It is found that a useful agent architecture requires far more than a string-based peer-to-peer messaging platform to support effective agent-based software development.


Message Content Agent Architecture Common Object Request Broker Architecture Private Address Client Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Foundation For Intelligent Physical Agents. FIPA specification. Located at, 2000.
  2. [2]
    J C Collis, D T Ndumu, H S Nwana, and L C Lee. The ZEUS agent building toolkit. BT Technology Journal, 16(3), July 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Cranefield and M. Purvis. UML as an ontology modelling language. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration, 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), 1999.
  4. [4]
    S. Cranefield and M. Purvis. Extending agent messaging to enable OO information exchange. In R. Trappl, editor, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium “From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation” (AT2AI-2) at the 5th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (EMCSR 2000), pages 573–578, Vienna, April 2000. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies. Published under the title “Cybernetics and Systems 2000”.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Stephen Cranefield, Martin Purvis, and Mariusz Nowostawski. Is it an ontology, a meta-model or an abstract syntax? Modelling FIPA agent communication. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods, 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 16-1–16-4, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Michael R. Genesereth and Steven P. Ketchpel. Software agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):48–53, July 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    JATLite Web site. Located at
  8. [8]
    New Zealand Distributed Information Systems Project Web site. Located at:
  9. [9]
    James Odell, H. Van Dyke Parunak, and Bernhard Bauer. Representing agent interaction protocols in UML. Paper submitted to AAAI Agents 2000 conference.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Martin Purvis, Stephen Cranefield, Geoff Bush, Daniel Carter, Bryce McKinlay, Mariusz Nowostawski, and Roy Ward. The NZDIS Project: an Agent-based Distributed Information Systems Architecture. In R.H. Sprague Jr., editor, CDROM Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M Reinhold. XML data binding specification, Java Specification Request JSR-000031. Sun Microsystems, 1999.
  12. [12]
    James Rumbaugh, Ivar Jacobson, and Grady Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R. Jennings. Pitfalls of agent-oriented development. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 385–391, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoff Bush
    • 1
  • Martin Purvis
    • 1
  • Stephen Cranefield
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations