Autonomous Cooperative Factory Control

  • David Vasko
  • Francisco Maturana
  • Angela Bowles
  • Stephen Vandenberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1881)

Abstract

In a highly flexible manufacturing line, the ability of the control system to react to and predict changes will ultimately determine the productivity of that line. This paper describes an Autonomous Cooperative System (ACS) for flexibly control a manufacturing line. The system allows each section of the line to have autonomy for controlling the operations of the underlying physical equipment. Autonomous decisions are carried out while the overall operations are optimized through cooperation among the controlled sections. ACS provides the ability to compensate for product changes, equipment wear and equipment failure. ACS was applied to a steel-rod production line. The operation of the line was observed during conditions of process and product changes. The results show how ACS reduced the impact of change and increased the productivity and flexibility of the line.

Keywords

Furnace Production Line Encapsulation Harness Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brooks, F.: Mythical Man Month, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agile Precision Sheet Metal Stamping Proposal, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standard and Technology, April llth, (1995).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Proceedings of the 4th Technical Advisory Committee Meeting, NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machine Systems, May 6–7th, (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Proceedings of Auto Body Consortium, Inc.: Near Zero Stamping, Inc. Kickoff Meeting, December 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Steels, L.: “Toward a Theory of Emergent Functionality” From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the lst International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1991).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bond, A. and Gasser, L.: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Hare, G. and Jennings, N.: Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley/Sons, (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clearwater, S.: Market-based control: A paradigm for distributed resource allocation, World Scientific, (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenschein, J. and Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing for Automated Negotiation among Computers, The MIT Press, (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N.: Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152, (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, R. and Smith, R.G.: Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20:63–109, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, K.H. and Cutkosky, M.: A.B., Conru, and S.H., Lee, An agent based approach to concurrent cable harness design, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Journal, 8(1), 45–61, (1993).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tenenbaum, J.M., Gruber, T.R., and Weber, J.C.: Lessons from SHADE and PACT. In Petrie, C. (Eds), Enterprise Modeling and Integration. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christensen, J.H.: iHolonic Manufacturing Systems: Initial architecture and standards direction, First European Conference on Holonic Manufacturing Systems, Hanover, Germany, 20pp, (1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parunak, H.V.D., Baker, A.D., and Clark, S.J.: The AARIA Agent Architecture: An Example of Requirements-Driven Agent-Based System Design. IN Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Rey, CA., (1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiming S., Maturana, F., and Norrie, D.: MetaMorph II: An Agent-Based Architecture for Distributed Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(3), 237–251, (2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Vasko
    • 1
  • Francisco Maturana
    • 1
  • Angela Bowles
    • 2
  • Stephen Vandenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Architecture and Systems Development Rockwell AutomationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.BHP Services Market DevelopmentMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations