Highlights of the European INRECA Projects

  • Ralph Bergmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2080)


INduction and REasoning from CAses was the title of two large European CBR projects funded by the European Commission from 1992 – 1999. In total, the two projects (abbreviated INRECA and INRECA-II) have obtained an overall funding of 3 MEuro, which enabled the 5 project partners to perform 55 person years of research and development work. The projects made several significant contributions to CBR research and helped shaping the European CBR community. The projects initiated the rise of three SMEs that base their main business on CBR application development, employing together more than 100 people in 2001. This paper gives an overview of the main research results obtained in both projects and provides links to the most important publications of the consortium.


Similarity Measure Class Hierarchy Application Cycle Maintenance Cycle Solution Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Althoff, K.-D., Wess, S., Bergmann, R., Maurer, F., Manago, M., Auriol, E., Conruyt, N., Traphöner, R., Bräuer, M. & Dittrich, S. (1994). Induction and Case-Based Reasoning for Classification Tasks. In: Bock, Lenski & Richter (Eds.) Information Systems and Data Analysis, Prospects-Foundations-Applications, Annual Conference of GfKl, Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Althoff, K.-D., Wess, S. & Traphöner, R. (1995a). Inreca-A Seamless Integration of Induction and Case-Based Reasoning for Decision Support Tasks. In: Morik & Herrmann (Eds.), Proc. 8th German Workshop on Machine Learning, University of Dortmund.Google Scholar
  3. Althoff, K-D, Auriol, E, Barletta, R., & Manago, M (1995b). A Review of Industrial Case-Based Reasoning Tools. AI Intelligence, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Althoff, K.-D. (1996). The INRECA Case Study. Habilitation Thesis. University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  5. Althoff, K.-D. & Wilke, W. (1997). Potential use of case-based reasoning in experience-based construction of CBR systems. In: Bergmann, R. & Wilke, W. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (GWCBR’97), LSA-97-01E, Centre for Learning Systems and Applications (LSA), University of Kaiserslautern, 31–38.Google Scholar
  6. Auriol, E., Manago, M., Althoff, K.-D., Wess, S. & Dittrich, S. (1994). Integrating Induction and Case-Based Reasoning: Methodological Approach and First Evaluations. In: Keane, Haton & Manago (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, Second European Workshop (EWCBR-94), Springer, 145–156.Google Scholar
  7. Auriol, E., Wess, S., Manago, M., Althoff, K.-D., & Traphoner, R. (1995). INRECA: A seamlessly integrated system based on inductive inference and case-based reasoning. In Aamodt, A. & Veloso, M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR95, Springer, 371–380.Google Scholar
  8. Auriol, E., Crowder, R.M., MacKendrick, R., Rowe R. & Knudsen, T. (1999). Documentation: An Application for the Diagnosis of a Welding Robot at Odense Steel Shipyard. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 12 (6), Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Bartsch-Spörl, B. (1996). Towards a methodology for how to make CBR systems work in practice. In: H.-D. Burkhard & M. Lenz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Humboldt University Berlin, 2–9.Google Scholar
  10. Bartsch-Spörl, B. (1997). How to Introduce CBR Applications in Customer Support. In Bergmann & Wilke (Eds.). Proceedings of the 5d German CBR Workshop, Report LSA-97-0E, University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  11. Bartsch-Spörl, B., Althoff, K.-D., Meissonnier, A. (1997). Reasoning about CBR systems. In _Bergmann & Wilke (Eds.). Proceedings of the 5d German CBR Workshop, Report LSA-97-0E, University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  12. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G. & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The experience factory. In: J. J. Marciniak (ed.), Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Bergmann, R. & Eisenecker, U. (1995). Fallbasiertes Schlieβen zur Unterstützung der Wiederverwendung objektorientierter Software: Eine Fallstudie. In: F. Maurer & M. M. Richter (Eds.) Proceedings der 3. Deutschen Expertensystemtagung, Infix, 152–169.Google Scholar
  14. Bergmann, R., Wilke, W., Vollrath, I. & Wess, S. (1996). Integrating general knowledge with object-oriented case representation and reasoning. In: H.-D. Burkhard & M. Lenz (Eds.) 4th German Workshop: Case-Based Reasoning, Humboldt-University Berlin, 120–127.Google Scholar
  15. Bergmann, R., Wilke, W., Althoff, K.-D., Breen, S. & Johnston, R. (1997). Ingredients for developing a case-based reasoning methodology. In: Bergmann, R. & Wilke, W. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th German Workshop in Case-Based Reasoning (GWCBR’97), University of Kaiserslautern, 49–58.Google Scholar
  16. Bergmann, R. (1998). On the use of taxonomies for representing case features and local similarity measures. In Gierl & Lenz (Eds.) 6th German Workshop on CBR.Google Scholar
  17. Bergmann, R. & Stahl, S. (1998). Similarity measures for object-oriented case representations. In B. Smyth & P. Cunningham (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR’98), Springer, 25–36.Google Scholar
  18. Bergmann, R., Breen, S., Göker, M., Manago, M., & Wess, S. (1999). Developing Industrial Case-Based Reasoning Applications: The INRECA Methodology. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1612, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Bergmann, R., Breen, S., Fayol, E., Göker, M., Manago, M., Schumacher, J., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A., Wess, S. & Wilke, W. (1998b). Collecting experience on the systematic development of CBR applications using the INRECA-II Methodology. In Smyth, B. & Cunningham, P. (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR’98), Springer, 460–470.Google Scholar
  20. Bergmann, R., Richter, M.M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A., Vollrath, I. (2001). Utility-Oriented Matching: A New Research Direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In: Vollrath, Schmitt, & Reimer: 9th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, GWCBR’01. In Schnurr, Staab, Studer, Stumme, Sure (Eds.): Professionelles Wissensmanagement, Shaker.Google Scholar
  21. Curet, O. and Jackson, M. (1996). Towards a methodology for case-based systems. Expert Systems’96. Proceedings of the 16th annual workshop of the British Computer Society.Google Scholar
  22. Göker, M. & Roth-Berghofer, T. (1999). The Development and Utilization of the Case-Based Help-Desk Support System HOMER. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 12 (6), Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Kitano, H. & Shimazu, H. (1996). The Experience-sharing architecture: A case-study in corporarte-wide case-based software quality control. In Leake (Ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lenz, M., Busch, K.-H., Hübner, A., & Wess, S. (1999). SIMATIC Knowledge Manager. In Aha, Becerra-Fernandez, Maurer, MuÑoz-Avila (Eds.). Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-Based Reasoning. Papers from the AAAI Workshop, Technical Report WS-99-10.Google Scholar
  25. Manago M. (1990). KATE: A Piece of Computer Aided Knowledge Engineering. In Gaines & Boose (Eds.) Proc. of the 5th AAAI workshop on KA for knowledge based systems, AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  26. Manago, M., Althoff, K.-D., Auriol, E., Traphöner, R., Wess, S., Conruyt, N., Maurer, F. (1993). Induction and Reasoning from Cases. In: Richter, M. M., Wess, S., Althoff, K.-D. & Maurer, F. (Eds.) (1993). Proc. 1st European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR-93), University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  27. Manago, M., Bergmann, R., Wess, S. & Traphöner, R. (1994). CASUEL: A common case representation language, INRECA Deliverable D1, INRECA Consortium.Google Scholar
  28. Manago M. & Auriol, E. (1995). Integrating Induction and Case-Based Reasoning for Troubleshooting CFM-56 Airfract Engines. In Bartsch-Spörl, Janetzko, & Wess (Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd German CBR Workshop, University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  29. Richter, M. M. & Wess, S. (1991). Similarity, Uncertainty and Case-Based Reasoning in PATDEX. Automated Reasoning-Essays in Honor of Woody Bledsoe, Kluwer.Google Scholar
  30. Richter, M. M. (1995). The Knowledge Contained in Similarity Measures. Invited talk at the First International Conference on CBR (ICCBR-95).
  31. Rombach, H. D. & Verlage, M. (1995). Directions in software process research. In: M.V. Zelkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Computers, Vol. 41, Academic Press, 1–61.Google Scholar
  32. Schumacher, J. & Traphöner, R. (2000). Knowledge Modeling WEBSELL Deliverable 3.4, WEBSELL Consortium.Google Scholar
  33. Wess, S. (1995). Fallbasiertes Problemlösen in wissensbasierten Systemen zur Entscheidungsunterstützung und Diagnostik. PhD Thesis, DISKI 126, infix.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Bergmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations