MOISE: An Organizational Model for Multi-agent Systems

  • Mahdi Hannoun
  • Olivier Boissier
  • Jaime S. Sichman
  • Claudette Sayettat
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1952)


This paper proposes an organizational model for a multi- agent system. This model is based on three major concepts: the roles which constrain the individual behaviors of the agents, the organizatio- nal links that regulate the social exchanges between these agents and the groups which constrain the layout of agents involved in strong in- teractions. This model is illustrated throughout the exploration and the management of the administrative tasks of an educational master trai- ning with intelligent agent assistants.


Multi-Agent System Organization Role Organizational link Group 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barbuceanu M., “Agents that work in Harmony by knowing and fulfilling their obligations”, In Proceedings of AAAI-98, Madison, WI, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boissier O., “Problème du contrôle dans un systéme intégré de vision, utilisation d’un système multi-agents”, Thèse de Doctorat, INP Grenoble, France, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boissier O., Beaune P., Proton H., Hannoun M., Carron T., Vercouter L., Sayettat C., “Multi-Agent System Toolkit”, Rapport Interne, Dépt. SIC, ENSM, St.-Étienne, Janvier 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi C., “Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations”, in proceedings of 1st ICMAS, San-Francisco USA, p. 41–48, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, P. R., Levesque, H. R., and Smith, I. “On team formation”. Hintikka, J. and Tuomela, R. (Eds.) Contemporary Action Theory. Synthese, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferber J., Gutknecht O. “A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems”. Proceedings of ICMAS, Paris, pp. 128–135, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gasser, L., “Social Conception of Knowledge and Action: DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics.” Artificial Intelligence. 47(1–3),pp. 107–138, 1991.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hannoun M., Sichman J. S., Boissier O., Sayettat C., “Dependence Relations Between Roles in a Multi-Agent System: Towards the Detection of Inconsistencies in Organization”, in MABS’98, Paris, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemaître C., Excelente C., “Multi-Agent Organization Approach”, In Proceedings of the second Iberoamerican Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent systems, Toledo, Spain, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pattison H. E., Corkill D. D., Lesser V. R., “Instantiating Descriptions of Organizational Structures”, in Distributed Artiticial Intelligence, M. N. Huhns editors, pp. 59–96, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sichman J. S., Conte R., Demazeau Y., Castelfranchi C., “A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks”, in Proceeding of ECAI’94, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    So Y., Durfee E. H., “An Organizational Self-Design Model for Organizational Change”. In Working Notes of the AAAI-93 Workshop on AI and Theories of Groups and Organizations, July, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stone P., Veloso M., “Task Decomposition and Dynamic Role Assignment for Real-Time Strategic Teamwork”, in ATAL’98, Paris, France, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tidhar G., Rao A. S., Sonenberg E. A., “Guided Team Selection”, Proceedings of ICMAS, Kyoto, pp. 369–376, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahdi Hannoun
    • 1
  • Olivier Boissier
    • 1
  • Jaime S. Sichman
    • 2
  • Claudette Sayettat
    • 1
  1. 1.Multi-Agent Systems GroupÉcole Nat. Sup. des MinesSaint-EtienneFrance
  2. 2.Dept. Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas DigitaisLaboratório de Técnicas InteligentesBrasil

Personalised recommendations