Revisiting Ontology Design: A Method Based on Corpus Analysis

  • Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles
  • Brigitte Biébow
  • Sylvie Szulman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1937)

Abstract

We promote a new approach for knowledge modelling based on knowledge elicitation from technical documents. It benefits of the increasing amount of available electronic texts and of the maturity of natural language processing tools. The approach defines a framework where the knowledge engineer selects the appropriate tools, combines their use and interprets their results to build up a domain model. The paper presents the method and reports an on-going application to design an ontology of knowledge engineering tools in French.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Assadi. Construction of a regional ontology from text and its use within a documentary system. In N. Guarino, editor, Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology and Information System (FOIS’98)), pages 236–249. IOS Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Aussenac-Gilles. Gediterm, un logiciel de gestion de bases de connaissances terminologiques. Terminologies Nouvelles, 19:111–123, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Aussenac-Gilles, D. Bourigault, A. Condamines, and C. Gros. How can knowledge acquisition benefit from terminology ? In Proc. of the 9th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop (Banff’95), 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Biébow and S. Szulman. Terminae: A linguistics-based tool for building of a domain ontology. In D. Fensel and R. Studer, editors, Proc. of the 11th European Workshop (EKAW’99), LNAI 1621, pages 49–66. Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Biébow and S. Szulman. Terminae: une approche terminologique pour la construction d’ontologies du domaine à partir de textes. In Proc. of Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle (RFIA’2000), volume II, pages 81–90, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Blázquez, M. Fernández, J.M. García-Pinar, and A. Gómez-Pérez. Building ontologies at the knowledge level using the ontology design environment. In Proc. of the 11th Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW’98), Banff, Canada, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Bourigault. Lexter, un Logiciel d’EXtraction de TERminologie, Application à l’acquisition des connaissances à partir de textes. PhD thesis, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Bourigault. Lexter, a natural language processing tool for terminology extraction. In Proc. of the 7th EURALEX International Congress, Goteborg, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Bourigault and J. Charlet. Construction d’un index thématique de l’ingénierie des connaissances. In Proc. of Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC’99), pages 107–118, Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Charlet and B. Bachimont. De l’acquisition à l’ingénierie des connaissances: Applications et perspectives. In Actes des Assises Nationales 1998 du PRC-I3, http://www.irit.fr/ACTIVITES/EQ_SMI/GRACQ/index-commf.html, 1998.
  11. 11.
    J. Charlet, M. Zacklad, G. Kassel, and D. Bourigault, editors. Ingénierie des Connaissances, évolutions récentes et nouveaux défis. Eyrolles, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Daoust. Système d’Analyse de Textes par Ordinateur. Centre ATO, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. David and P. Plante. Termino version 1.0. Centre d’Analyse de Textes par Ordinateur, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Domingue and E. Motta. A knowledge-based news server supporting ontologydriven story enrichment and knowledge retrivial. In D. Fensel and R. Studer, editors, Proc. of the 11th European Workshop (EKAW’99), LNAI 1621, pages 103–120. Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Enguehard and L. Pantéra. Automatic natural acquisition of terminology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 2/1:27–32, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Faure and C. Nedellec. Knowledge acquisition of predicate argument structures from technical texts using machine learning: The system ASIUM. In D. Fensel and R. Studer, editors, Proc. of the 11th European Workshop (EKAW’99), LNAI 1621, pages 329–334. Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Gomez. Acquiring knowledge about the habitats of animals from encyclopedic texts. In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems (KAW’95), volume 1, pages 6.1–6.22, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Gómez-Pérez. Knowledge sharing and reuse. Hand-book of Expert Systems-CRC, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Habert, E. Naulleau, and A. Nazarenko. Symbolic word clustering formedium-size corpora. In Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’96), pages 490–495, Copenhagen, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    U. Hahn, M. Klenner, and K. Schnattinger. Automated knowledge acquisition meets metareasoning: Incremental quality assessment of concept hypotheses during texts understanding. In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems (KAW’98), 1998.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Hamon, A. Nazareko, and C. Gros. A step towards the detection of semantic variants of terms in technical documents. In Proc. of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL’98)), pages 498–504. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Hull and F. Gomez. Automatic acquistion of historical knowledge from encyclopedic texts. In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for KnowledgeBased Systems (KAW’98), 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Kassel, M.-H. Abel, C. Barry, P. Boulitreau, C. Irastorza, and S. Perpette. Construction et exploitation d’une ontologie pour la gestion des connaissances d’une équipe de recherche. In Proc. of Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC’2000), pages 251–259, Toulouse, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Mikheev and S. Finch. A workbench for acquisition of ontological knowledge from natural language. In Proc. of the 9th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW’95), 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Morin. Acquisition de patrons lexico-syntaxiques caractéristiques d’une relation sémantique. TAL (Traitement Automatique des Langues), 40/1:143–166, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Fredman Noy and C. Hafner. The state of the art in ontology design: a survey and comparative review. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, pages 53–74, 1997.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. Poibeau. Repérage des entités nommées: un enjeu pour les système de veille. Terminologies Nouvelles, 19:43–51, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    U. Reimer. Automatic knowledge acquisition from texts: Learning terminological knowledge via text understanding and inductive generalization. In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems (KAW’90), pages 27.1–27.16, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. Rousselot, P. Frath, and R. Oueslati. Extracting concepts and relations from corpora. In Proc. of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96), 1996.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Schmidt and F. Schmalhofer. Case-oriented knowledge acquisition from texts. In B. Wielinga, J. Boose, B. Gaines, G. Schreiber, and M. Van Someren, editors, Proc. of the 4th European Workshop (EKAW’90). IOS Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. Van de Velde, and B. Wielinga, editors. Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Séguéla. Adaptation semi-automatique d’une base de marqueurs de relations sémantiques sur des corpus spécialisés. Terminologies Nouvelles, 19:52–60, 1999.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    P. Séguéla and N. Aussenac. Extraction de relations sémantiques entre termes et enrichissement de modèles du domaine. In Proc. of Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC’99), pages 79–88, Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Slodzian. Comment revisiter la doctrine terminologique aujourd’hui? La Banque des Mots, 7/95:11–18, 1995.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    M. Uschold. Knowledge level modelling: concepts and terminology. The knowledge engineering review, 13/1:5–29, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    C. Vogel. Génie cognitif. Masson, Paris, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles
    • 1
  • Brigitte Biébow
    • 2
  • Sylvie Szulman
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse(IRIT)Université Toulouse 3TOULOUSE Cedex 4
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris-Nord(LIPN)Université de Paris-NordVILLETANEUSE(France)

Personalised recommendations