A Context-Sensitive Nomadic Exhibition Guide

  • Reinhard Oppermann
  • Marcus Specht
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1927)


The paper describes a nomadic guide that considers the context of use (CoU) for information selection and presentation. A nomadic system is de- fined by continuous access to information spaces independent from specific de- vices. The CoU is defined by the location and characteristics of the user. Inter- ests of the user deduced from the navigation in the physical and information space are the main goal of information adaptation in the paper. A prototype of a nomadic system that adapts the information to the user needs is presented.


Physical Space User Model Information Space Information Presentation Information Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Makimoto, T. and D. Manners, Digital Nomad. 1997: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brézillon, P., Introduction to the Special Issue “Using context in applications”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1998. 48: p. 303–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abowd, G.D., et al., Cyberguide: A Mobile Context-Aware Tour Guide. Baltzer Journals, 1996(September 23).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abowd, G.D., et al. Context-awareness in wearable and ubiquitous computing. Poster. in 1st International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC’97. 1997. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmidt, A., M. Beigl, and H.-W. Gellersen, There is more to Context than Location. Rostock,. 199Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wallace, M.D. and T.J. Anderson, Approaches to Interface Design. Interacting with Computers, 1993. 5(3): p. 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heusinger, L., Marburger Informations-, Dokumentations-und Administrations-System (MIDAS) Handbuch. 3 ed. Literatur und Archiv, ed. G. JÄger, et al. Vol. 4. 1994, München: K.G. Saur. 593.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deutsch, M., Field Theory in Social Psychology, in The Handbook of Social Psychology, G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, Editors. 1968, Addison-Wesley: Reading Mass. p. 412–487.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubinstein, S., Die Interessen, in Die Motivation menschlichen Handelns, H. Thomae, Editor. 1970, Kiepenheuer &Witsch: Köln, Wien. p. 136–144.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruner, J.S., Bereitschaft zum Lernen., in PÄdagogische Psychologie., F. Weinert, Editor. 1961, Kiepenheuer & Witsch: Köln, Wien. p. 105–117.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulz von Thun, W., KommunikationsprozeΒ., in Publizistik., E. Noelle-Neumann, Winfried Schulz von Thun, Editor. 1971: Frankfurt am Main. p. 89–109.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. 1975, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McManus, P.M., Making sense of exhibits, in Museum Languages: Objects and Texts, G. Kavanagh, Editor. 1991, Leicester University Press: Leicester, London and New York. p. 35–46.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weidenmann, B., Psychische Prozesse beim Verstehen von Bildern. 1988, Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kowalski, K., Praxis der Kunsterziehung 2. Werkbetrachtung. 1970, Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kayser, T. and C. Körner, Abiturwissen Malerei. 1997, Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofer, M., R. Pekrun, and W. Zielinski, Die Psychologie des Lernens, in PÄdagogische Psychologie, B. Weidenmann, Andreas Krapp et al., Editor. 1994, Belz: Weinheim. p. 219–272.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Specht, M., HIPS Questionnaire result report,. 1998, GMD: Sankt Augustin. p. 13.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gabrielli, F., P. Marti, and L. Petroni, The environment as interface, in Proceedings of the i3 Annual Conference: Community of the Future, October 20-22, 1999 in Siena, M. Caenepeel, D. Benyon, and D. Smith, Editors. 1999, The Human Communication Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh. p. 44–47.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Véron, E. and M. Levasseur, Ethnographie de l’exposition: L’espace, le corps et le sens. 1991, Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou Bibliothèque Publique d’Information.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bianchi, A., M. Zancarano, Tracking Users′ Movements in an Artistic Physical Space, in Proceedings of the i3 Annual Conference: Community of the Future, October 20–22, 1999 in Siena, M. Caenepeel, D. Benyon, and D. Smith, Editors. 1999, The Human Communication Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh. p. 103–106.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Umiker-Sebeok, J., Behavior in a Museum: A Semio-Cognitive Approach to Museum Consumption Experiences. Signifying Behavior, 1994. 1 (1994)(1).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Not, E., et al., Person-Oriented Guided Visits in a Physical Museum. In: D. Bearman/ J. Trant eds.: Proceedings of the Museum Interactive Multimedia 1997: Cultural Heritage Systems. Design and Interfaces. Paris, 3–5 September 1997, pp. 69–79.,. 1997.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiser, M., The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 1991. 265(3): p. 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Oppermann
    • 1
  • Marcus Specht
    • 1
  1. 1.GMD - German National Research Center for Information Technology Institute for Applied Information TechnologySanktAugustin

Personalised recommendations