Standardizing Hypertext: Where Next for OHP?

  • David Millard
  • Hugh Davis
  • Luc Moreau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1903)

Abstract

Over the last six years the Open Hypermedia Systems Working Group (OHSWG) has been working in a coordinated effort to produce a protocol which will allow components of an Open Hypermedia System to talk to one another in a standardised manner. In this paper we reflect on this work and the knowledge that has come out of it, evaluating the different approaches to standardisation in the light of our experiences. We discuss the problems we encountered and redefine the goals of the effort to be more realistic, presenting the Fundamental Open Hypermedia Model (FOHM) as an example of this more realistic approach. Finally we describe a possible future path that encompasses the research interests of the OHSWG while still leading ultimately to interoperability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Open Hypermedia Systems Working Group (OHSWG) home page. http://www.ohswg.org/.
  2. 2.
    Kenneth M. Anderson, Richard N. Taylor, and E. James Whitehead. Chimera: Hypertext for heterogeneous software environments. In ECHT’ 94. Proceedings of the ACM European conference on Hypermedia technology, Sept. 18–23, 1994, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pages 94–197, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tim Bray, Jean Paoli, and C. M. Sperberg-McQueen. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Recommendation 10-February-1998, February 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leslie A. Carr, David C. DeRoure, Wendy Hall, and Gary J. Hill. The distributed link service: A tool for publishers, authors and readers. World Wide Web Journal, 1(1):647–656, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hugh C. Davis, Simon Knight, and Wendy Hall. Light hypermedia link services: A study of third party application integration. In ECHT’ 94. Proceedings of the ACM European conference on Hypermedia technology, Sept. 18–23, 1994, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pages 41–50, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hugh C. Davis, Antoine Rizk, and Andy J. Lewis. OHP: A draft proposal for a standard open hypermedia protocol. In Uffe Kock Wiil and Serge Demeyer, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext’ 96, Washington, D.C., March 16–20. Available as Report No. ICS-TR-96-10 from the Dept. of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, pages 27–53, March 1996. UCI-ICS Technical Report 96-10, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FIPA. Fipa 97 specification, part 2: Agent communication language. Technical report, Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, Geneva, Switzerland, November 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.M. Fountain, Wendy Hall, Ian Heath, and Hugh C. Davis. Microcosm: An open model for hypermedia with dynamic linking”-hypertext: Concepts, systems and applications. In European Conference on Hypertext (ECHT’90), INRIA, Versailles, France, pages 298–311, November 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaj Grønbæk and Randall H. Trigg. Design issues for a Dexter-based hypermedia system. Communications of the ACM, 37(3):40–49, February 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank Halasz and Mayer Schwartz. The dexter hypertext reference model. Communications of the ACM, 37(2):30–39, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yannis Labrou and Tim Finin. A proposal for a new KQML specification. Technical Report TR CS-97-03, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, February 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. Spatial hypertext: Designing for change. Communications of the ACM, 38:88–97, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    David E. Millard, Luc Moreau, Hugh C. Davis, and Siegfried Reich. FOHM: A fundamental open hypertext model for investigating interoperability between hypertext domains. In Proceedings of the’ 00 ACM Conference on Hypertext, May 30–June 3, San Antonio, TX, pages 93–102, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    David E. Millard, Siegfried Reich, and Hugh C. Davis. Dynamic service discovery and invocation in OHP. In Uffe Kock Wiil, editor, Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext’ 99 Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, February 21–25. Available as Report No. CS-99-01 from the Dept. of Computer Science, 6700 Aalborg University Esbjerg, Denmark, pages 38–42, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luc Moreau, Nick Gibbins, David DeRoure, Samhaa El-Beltagy, Wendy Hall, Gareth Hughes, Dan Joyce, Sanghee Kim, Danius Michaelides, Dave Millard, Sigi Reich, Robert Tansley, and Mark Weal. SoFAR with DIM agents. An agent framework for distributed information management. In PAAM 2000. The Fifth International Conference and Exhibition on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents. April 10–12, 2000, Manchester, UK, pages 369–388, April 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siegfried Reich, Jon P. Griffiths, David E. Millard, and Hugh C. Davis. Solent — a platform for distributed open hypermedia applications. In Trevor Bench Capon, Giovanni Soda, and A Min Tjoa, editors, Database and Expert Systems Applications. 10th Intl. Conference, DEXA 99, Florence, Italy, volume 1677 of LNCS, pages 802–811, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, August 1999. Springer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siegfried Reich, David E. Millard, and Hugh C. Davis. Naming in OHP. In Uffe Kock Wiil, editor, Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext’ 99 Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, February 21–25. Available as Report No. CS-99-01 from the Dept. of Computer Science, 6700 Aalborg University Esbjerg, Denmark, pages 43–47, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegfried Reich, Uffe K. Wiil, Peter J. Nürnberg, Hugh C. Davis, Kaj Grønbæk, Kenneth M. Anderson, David E. Millard, and Jörg M. Haake. Addressing interoperability in open hypermedia: The design of the open hypermedia protocol. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 5:207–248, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olav Reinert, Dirk Bucka-Lassen, Claus A. Pedersen, and Peter J. Nürnberg. CAOS: A collaborative and open spatial structure service component with incremental spatial parsing. In Proceedings of the’ 99 ACM Conference on Hypertext, February 21–25, 1999, Darmstadt, Germany, pages 49–50, February 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antoine Rizk and Louis Sauter. Multicard: An open hypermedia system. In ECHT’ 92. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Hypertext, November 30–December 4, 1992, Milan, Italy, pages 4–10, 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    John L. Schnase, John L. Leggett, David L. Hicks, Peter J. Nürnberg, and J. Alfredo Sánchez. Open architectures for integrated, hypermedia-based information systems. In HICSS 94 — 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science., 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. van Dyke Parunak. Don’t link me in: Set-based hypermedia for taxonomic reasoning. In Proceedings of the’ 91 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Dec. 15–18, 1991, San Antonio, TX, pages 233–242, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weigang Wang and Jörg M. Haake. Implementation issues on ohs-based workflow services. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext’ 99 Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, February 21–25. Available as Report No. CS-99-01 from the Dept. of Computer Science, 6700 Aalborg University Esbjerg, Denmark, pages 52–56, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uffe Kock Wiil and John J. Leggett. HyperForm: using extensibility to develop dynamic, open and distributed hypertext systems. In ECHT’ 92. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Hypertext, November 30–December 4, 1992, Milan, Italy, pages 251–261, 1992.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uffe Kock Wiil and Kaspar Østerbye, editors. Proceedings of the ECHT’ 94 Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, September 1994. Tech. Report R-94-2038, Dept. of Computer Science, Aalborg Univ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Millard
    • 1
  • Hugh Davis
    • 1
  • Luc Moreau
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Electronics and Computer ScienceIntelligence, Agents, Multimedia, University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations