Advertisement

ADELFE: A Methodology for Adaptive Multi-agent Systems Engineering

  • Carole Bernon
  • Marie-Pierre Gleizes
  • Sylvain Peyruqueou
  • Gauthier Picard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2577)

Abstract

Adaptive software is used in situations where either the environment is unpredictable or the system is open. This paper presents a methodology named ADELFE, which is led by the Rational Unified Process (RUP) but is devoted to software engineering of adaptive multi- agent systems. ADELFE guarantees that the software is developed according to the AMAS theory1. We focus this presentation on the additions of ADELFE regarding the three first core workflows of the RUP. Therefore, during the requirements phase, the environment of the studied system must be defined and characterized. Then, in the analysis phase, the engineer is guided to decide to use adaptive multi-agent technology and to identify the agents through the system and the environment models. Finally, the design workflow of ADELFE must provide the cooperative agent’s model and helps the developer to define the local agents. behavior. We illustrate the methodology by applying it to a case study: a timetable design.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C. Bernon, M-P. Gleizes, G. Picard && P. Glize—The ADELFE Methodology for an Intranet System— Agent-Oriented Information Systems (AOIS’02) at CAiSE.02, Toronto, May 2002.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    F. M. T. Brazier, P.A.T. Van Eck && J. Treur-Modelling a society of simple agents: From conceptual specification to experimentation-Journal of Applied Intelligence, 14:161–178, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Burrafato && M. Cossentino—Designing a Multi-Agent Solution for a Bookstore with the PASSI Methodology—AOIS.02 at CAiSE.02, Toronto, May 2002.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Caire, F. Leal, P. Chainho, R. Evans, F. Garijo, J. Gomez, G. Pavon, P. Kearney, J. Stark && P. Massonet-Agent Oriented Analysis using MESSAGE/UML-AOSE 2001.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    V. Camps, M-P. Gleizes, S. Trouilhet-Properties Analysis of a Learning Algorithm for Adaptive Systems—In International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, Editions Chaos, Liége, Belgium, 1998. Available at http://www.irit.fr/SMAC.
  6. [6]
    J. Castro, M. Kolp && J. Mylopoulos —A Requirements-driven Development Methodology—In Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’01), Stafford, UK—June, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Ferber-Les Sytèmes Multi-Agents. Vers une Intelligence Collective-InterEditions 1995Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M-P. Gleizes, V. Camps, P. Glize-A Theory of Emergent Computation Based on Cooperative Self-Organization for Adaptive Artificial Systems-4 th European Congress of Systems Science, Valencia, 1999. Available at http://www.irit.fr/SMAC.
  9. [9]
    C.M. Iglesias, M. Garijo && J. C. Gonzalez-A Survey of Agent-Oriented Methodologies-In Intelligent Agents V, ATAL’98, LNAI 1555, Springer Verlag 1999.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jacobson, G. Booch && J. Rumbaugh—The Unified Software Development Process—Addison-Wesley, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Kinny, M. Georgeff, && A. Rao-A Methodology and Modeling Technique for Systems of BDI Agents-In W. Van de Velde and J.W. Perram, editors, Agents Breaking Away: Proceedings of the 7 th European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (LNAI 1038), pp 56–71. Springer Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Odell, H.V. Parunak, && B. Bauer-Extending UML for Agents-In Proceedings of the Agent Oriented Information Systems (AOIS) Workshop at the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2000.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Robertson, R. Laddaga && H. Shrobe-Introduction: the First International Workshop on Self-Adaptive Software-In Proceedings of the 1 st IWSAS edited by P. Robertson, R. Laddaga & H. Shrobe in LNCS 1936, pp 1–10, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Russel && P. Norvig-Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach-Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. H. Sparkman, S. A. Deloach, A. L. Self —Automated Derivation of Complex Agent Architectures from Analysis Specifications—AOSE-2001, Montreal, Canada, May 29th 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Wooldridge && P. Ciancarini-Agent-Oriented Software Engineering: the State of the Art-In P. Ciancarini & M. Wooldridge, ed., Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, Springer Verlag LNAI 1957, January 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings && D. Kinny-A Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design-In Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 99), pp 69–76, Seattle, WA, May 1999.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. Zambonelli, N. R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge-Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems-In P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge, eds., AOSE’00, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole Bernon
    • 1
  • Marie-Pierre Gleizes
    • 2
  • Sylvain Peyruqueou
    • 2
  • Gauthier Picard
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche en Informatique de ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Artal TechnologiesRamonville Saint-AgneFrance

Personalised recommendations