A Knowledge Based Approach on Educational Metadata Use

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2563)


One of the most rapidly evolving e-services is e-Learning, that is, the creation of advanced educational resources that are accessible on-line and, potentially, offer numerous advantages over the traditional ones like intelligent access, interoperability between two or more educational resources and adaptation to the user. The driving force behind these approaches is the definition of the various standards about educational metadata, that is, data describing learning resources, the learner, assessment results, etc. The internal details of systems that utilize these metadata is an open issue since these efforts are primarily dealing with “what” and not “how”. Under the light of these emerging efforts, we present CG-PerLS, a knowledge based approach for organizing and accessing educational resources. CG-PerLS is a model of a web portal for learning objects that encodes the educational metadata in the Conceptual Graph knowledge representation formalism, and uses related inference techniques to provide advanced functionality. The model allows learning resource creators to manifest their material and client-side learners to access these resources in a way tailored to their individual profile and educational needs.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Brkich F. and Wilkinson R.: “A Conceptual Graph Matching Algorithm for Information Retrieval”, Proceedings 1st Australian Conceptual Structures Workshop, University of New England, New South Wales, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brusilovsky P.: “Adaptive and Intelligent Technologies for Web-based Education”, In C. Rollinger and C. Peylo (eds.), “Kunstliche Intelligenz”, Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Corby O., Dieng R. and Hebert C.: “A Conceptual Graph model for W3C Resource Description Framework”, Proceedings 8th Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’2000), Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. [5]
    Gerbe O.: “Conceptual Graphs for Corporate Knowledge Repositories”, Proceedings 5th Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’97), 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [6]
    Kokkoras F. and Vlahavas I.: “COMFRESH: a Common Framework for Expert Systems and Hypertext”, Information Processing and Management, Vol.31, No.4, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [7]
    IEEE P1484.12/D6.0, “Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata”, February 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [8]
    Martin P. and Eklund P.: “Embedding Knowledge in Web Documents”, Proceedings 8th WWW Conference, special issue of The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, Toronto, Canada, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. [9]
    Murray T.: “A Model for Distributed Curriculum on the WWW”, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Vol.5, 1998. Available at:
  9. [10]
    IEEE P1484.2/D7, “Draft Standard for Learning Technology-Public and Private Information (PAPI) for Learners (PAPI Learner)”, November 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [11]
    Petermann H., Euler L. and Bontcheva K.: “CG-Pro: a Prolog Implementation of Conceptual Graphs”, Technical Report, Hamburg University, FBI-HH-M-251/95, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [12]
    Puder A., Markwitz S. and Gudermann F.: “Service Trading Using Conceptual Graphs”, Proceedings 3rd Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’95), Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [13]
    ADL: “Sharable Courseware Object Reference Model (SCORM)”, Version 1.1, January 2001. Available at
  13. [14]
    Sowa J.: “Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Ma-chine”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. [15]
    Vassileva J.: “Dynamic Course Generation on the WWW”, Proceedings 8th World Conference on AI in Education (AI-ED97), Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems, Kobe, Japan, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. [16]
    Corbett D.: “A Method for Reasoning with Ontologies Represented as Conceptual Graphs”, In: M. Brooks, D. Corbett and M. Stumptner (Eds.): AI 2001, Springer-Verlag LNAI Vol. 2256, pp.130–141, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [17]
    Genest D. and Salvat E.: “A Platform Allowing Typed Nested Graphs: How CoGITo Became CoGITaNT”, Proceedings 6th Conference on Conceptual Structures, Montpellier, France, pp.154–161, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. [19]
    Kokkoras F. and Vlahavas I.: “eLPA: an e-Learner’s Personal Assistant”, Proceedings Workshop on Application of Conceptual Structures, Bulgaria, 2002. Available electronically only at
  18. [20]
    Gerbe O. and Mineau G.: “The CG Formalism as an Ontolingua for Web-Oriented Representation Languages”, Proceedings 10th Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’02), pp. 205–219, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. [21]
    IMS Global Learning Consortium, Learning Resource Metadata (LOM) Specification, Version 1.2.1, Final Specification, September 2001. Available at metadata/index.html
  20. [22]
    IMS Global Learning Consortium, Learner Information Package (LIP) Specification, Version 1.0, Final Specification, March 2001. Available at:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Center for Research and TechnologyHellas Informatics and Telematics InstituteThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations