Skip to main content

Effects of Debris Mitigation Measures on Environment Projections

  • Chapter
Space Debris

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((ASTROENG))

  • 3115 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 5 outlined the consequences of continuing space activities in a businessas-usual fashion, with the conclusion that a timely change of operational practices is required in order to maintain a stable space debris environment, which will permit safe space operations in the long-term future. The main driver for future debris proliferation was found to be the on-orbit mass reservoir, predominantly of LEO objects beyond 100 kg, and potential large-size colliders (mission-related, or due to on-orbit explosions), capable of producing catastrophic break-ups. These break-ups may lead to enhanced feedback collisions and to the onset of a selfsustained runaway situation due to collisional cascading. In the current chapter debris mitigation measures will be identified that can effectively tackle the main causes of an uncontrolled population growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

6.7 References

  • Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, A. (1984). Pocketbook of Mathematical Functions. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt a.M.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, B. N. (1986). Design of Geosynchronous Spacecraft. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alby, F. (2003). SPOT-1 End of Life Disposal Manoeuvres. 35th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, PEDAS1/B1.6-0035-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (1995). NASA Safety Standard — Guidelines and Assessment Procedures for Limiting Orbital Debris. NSS 1740.14.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (1996). Space Debris Mitigation Standard. NASDA-STD-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (1997). US Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (1999). CNES Exigence de Securité — Débris Spatiaux: Méthode et Procedure. CNES, MPM-51-00-12, issue 1, rev. 0.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (2000). Russian Aviation & Space Agency (RASA) Branch Standard — General Requirements for Space Debris Mitigation. RASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (2001). European Space Debris Safety and Mitigation Standard — Draft. issue 1, rev. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • anon. (2002). IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines. issue 1, rev. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekey, I. (1997). Project Orion: Orbital Debris Removal Using Ground-Based Sensors and Lasers. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 699–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondarenko, S. and Lyagushin, S. (1997). Prospects of Using Military Lasers and Military Space Technology for Space Debris Removal. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 703–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnal, C., Sanchez, M., and Naumann, W. (1997). Ariane Debris Mitigation Measures. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 681–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C. (2001). MEO Disposal Orbit Stability and Direct Re-Entry Strategy. 11th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, AAS-01-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, R. and Forward, R. (1999). Performance of the Termination Tetherâ„¢ for Autonomous De-Orbit of LEO Spacecraft. 50th IAF Congress, IAF-99-IAA.6.6.09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, R., Hernández, C., Klinkrad, H., Flury, W., and Agapov, V. (2004). Space Traffic Management in the Geostationary Ring. 55th IAF Congress, IAA-04-IAA.5.12.4.05.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Hele, D. (1987). Satellite Orbits in an Atmosphere: Theory and Applications. Blackie, Glasgow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkrad, H. et al. (2003). ESA Space Debris Mitigation Handbook. ESA/ESOC, second edition. issue 1.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompanietz, E. et al. (2000). Minimization of Space Debris Formation on Zenith-3SL ILV Launches Within the Sea Launch Program. 51st IAF Congress, IAA-00-IAA.6.6.05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, K. (2003). On the Stability of Near Semi-Synchronous, Near Circular Orbits. Technical Report no. 459, issue 2, rev. 0, ESA/ESOC/MAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, P. (1999). Classification of Geostationary Objects — Users Guide. Technical Report no. 420, ESA/ESOC/MAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. (1997). Elimination of the Potential Hazard of the Long March 4 Launch Vehicle On-Orbit Break-Up. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 689–691.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinkrad, H., Martin, C., Walker, R., Jehn, R. (2006). Effects of Debris Mitigation Measures on Environment Projections. In: Space Debris. Springer Praxis Books. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25448-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37674-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics