Advertisement

A Contribution to the Theory and Practice of Cognitive Prostheses

  • Eric Neufeld
  • David Callele
  • David Mould
  • Sonje Kristtorn
  • Raymond Rabu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2733)

Abstract

Ford and Hayes suggest that rather than think of AI as independent technologies, we think of AI as a human/machine partnership, where the AI “amplifies, rather than replaces human intellectual ability”. We used their perspective to build a smart mixed initiative edge detection tool and believe this approach will be particularly useful in building other effective intelligent graphical tools.

Keywords

Logic Programming Intelligent Tutor System Edge Detection Algorithm Baseline Algorithm Adaptive Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ford, Kenneth M. and Patrick J. Hayes. Cognitive Prostheses. Invited talk FLAIRS-99, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ford, Kenneth. Private communication.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayes, Patrick J. and Kenneth M. Ford. Turing Test Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of IJCAI-95 (1995) 972–977Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffman, R.R., J.W. Coffey, K.M. Ford, M.J. Carnot. STORM-LK A Human-Centered Knowledge Model for Weather Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 45 th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Minneapolis (Oct 2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kowalski, Robert. Algorithms = Logic + Control. Communications of the ACM. 22:7 (1979) 424–436zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kyburg, H.E., Jr. Science and Reason, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lesperance, Y., K. Tam, K., and M. Jenkin. Reactivity in a logic-based robot programming framework. In Proceedings of Cognitive Robotics-Papers from the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium, Orlando, Florida (1998) 98–105Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackworth, Alan. Recycling the Cycle of Perception: A Polemic. Invited Talk, abstract in Proceedings of AI-2002, the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag LNAI 2338 (2002) 102Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.I. McCalla, “The Central Importance of Student Modelling to Intelligent Tutoring”, in E. Costa (ed.), New Directions for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1992) 107–131.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mortenson, E. and Barrett, W.A. Interactive Segmentation with Intelligent Scissors. Graphical Models and Image Processing 60 (1998) 349–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neufeld, E., Popoola H., Callele, D. and D. Mould. Mixed Initiative Interactive Edge Detection. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2003, (to appear)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    TOUCH Telemedicine Project, http://hsc.unm.edu/touch/.
  13. 13.
    Trealease, Robert D. Anatomical Informatics: Millenial Perspectives on a New Frontier. The Anatomical Record 269 (2002) 224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Virtual Human Embryo Project, Louisiana State University, http://virtualhumanembryo.lsuhsc.edu/demos/Stage13/Stage13.htm
  15. 15.
    Williams, D.J. and M. Shah. A Fast Algorithm for Active Contours and Curvature Estimation. CVGIP: Image Understanding 55:1 (January 1992) 14–26zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Neufeld
    • 1
  • David Callele
    • 1
  • David Mould
    • 1
  • Sonje Kristtorn
    • 1
  • Raymond Rabu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations