Consciousness and Quantum Brain Dynamics

  • Gordon Globus
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Summary

The opposition to quantum brain theory is “deconstructed”. The quantum brain theory originated by Umezawa and coworkers is elaborated as a unimode quantum brain dynamics (QBD), a Hermitean dual-mode QBD and a non-Hermitean dual-mode QBD. The non-Hermitean version is applied to mathematics, where the Riemann hypothesis is seen in a fresh way. The philosophical implications of this approach turn out to be “monadological”.

Keywords

Critical Line Riemann Hypothesis John Benjamin Input Invariance Nontrivial Zero 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davydov, A.S. (1991). Solitons in Molecular Systems. (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Derbyshire, J. (2003). Prime Obsession. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination (B. Johnson Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feigl, H. (1967). The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fröhlich, H. (1968). Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2:641–649.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Globus, G. (1987). Dream Life, Wake Life. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Globus, G. (2003). Quantum Closures and Disclosures (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Globus, G. (2004). In Brain and Being, (eds.) G. Globus, K. Pribram & G. Vitiello (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Hagan, S.R. Hameroff, and J.A. Tuszynski (2002). Physical Review E 65,61901:1–10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heidegger, M. (1962 [1927]). Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heidegger, M. (1999), Contributions to Philosophy (from Enowning), P. Emad and, K. Maly, Trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jibu, M., Hagan, S., Hameroff, S.R., Pribram, K.H., and Yasue, K. (1994). Biosystems 32:195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jibu, M. and Yasue, K. (1995). Quantum Brain Dynamics and Consciousness (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jibu, M. and Yasue, K. (2004). In Brain and Being, (eds.) G. Globus, K. Pribram, and G. Vitiello (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuhn, T. (1976). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCrone, J. (2003). The Lancet Neurology 2:450–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakagomi, T. (in press). In Brain and Being, (eds.) G. Globus, K. Pribram, and G. Vitiello (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Natsoulas, T. (1978). American Psychologist 33:906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ricciardi, L.M. and Umezawa, H. (1967). Kybernetik, 4:44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sautoy, M. du (2003). The Music of the Primes. (New York: HarperCollins).MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seife, C. (2000). Science 287, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stuart, C.I.J.M., Takahashi, Y., and Umezawa, H. (1978). Journal of Theoretical Biology 71:605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stuart, C.I.J.M., Takahashi, Y., and Umezawa, H. (1979). Foundations of Physics 9:301–327.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takahashi, Y. and Umezawa, H. (1975). Collective Phenomena 2:53–80.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takahashi, Y. and Jibu. In Brain and Being, (eds.) G. Globus, K. Pribram, and G. Vitiello (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tegmark, M. (2000). Physical Review, E61:4194–4206.ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Umezawa, H. (1993). Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Therma Physics (New York: American Institute of Physics).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Umezawa, H. (1995). Mathematical Japonica, 41:109–124.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vitiello, G. (1995). International Journal of Modern Physics B, 9:973–989.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vitiello, G. (2001). My Double Unveiled (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vitiello, G. (2004). In Brain and Being, (eds.) G. Globus, K. Pribram, and G. Vitiello (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon Globus
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychiatry and PhilosophyUniversity of California IrvineLaguna BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations