Advertisement

A Hardware Architecture for Dynamic Performance and Energy Adaptation

  • Phillip Stanley-Marbell
  • Michael S. Hsiao
  • Ulrich Kremer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2325)

Abstract

Energy consumption of any component in a system may sometimes constitute just a small percentage of that of the overall system, making it necessary to address the issue of energy efficiency across the entire range of system components, from memory, to the CPU, to peripherals. Presented is a hardware architecture for detecting regions of application execution at runtime, for which there is opportunity to run a device at a slightly lower performance level, by reducing the operating frequency and voltage, to save energy. The proposed architecture, the Power Adaptation Unit (PAU) may be used to control the operating voltage of various system components, ranging from the CPU core, to memory and peripherals.

An evaluation of the tradeoffs in performance versus energy savings and hardware cost of the PAU is conducted, along with results on its efficacy for a set of benchmarks. It is shown that on the average, a single entry PAU provides energy savings of 27%, with a corresponding performance degradation of 0.75% for the SPEC CPU 2000 integer and floating point benchmarks investigated.

Keywords

Energy Saving Memory Access Clock Cycle Performance Degradation Hardware Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    RDRAM. http://www.rambus.com, 1999.
  2. [2]
    D.H. Albonesi. Selective cache ways: On-demand cache resource allocation. Journal of Instruction Level Parallelism, 2(2000):1–6, May 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. R. Allen and K. Kennedy. Automatic translation of Fortran programs to vector form. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 9(4):491–542, Oct. 1987.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Brooks and M. Martonosi. Dynamic Thermal Management for High-Performance Microprocessors. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, January 2001.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Brooks, V. Tiwari, and M. Martonosi. Wattch: A Framework for Architectural-Level Power Analysis and Optimizations. In 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 83–94, June 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T.D. Burd and R.W. Brodersen. Design issues for dynamic voltage scaling. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, ISLPED’00, pages 9–14, July 2000.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C.-H. Hsu and U. Kremer. Compiler-Directed Dynamic Voltage Scaling Based on Program Regions. Technical Report DCS-TR-461, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, November 2001.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C.-H. Hsu, U. Kremer, and M. Hsiao. Compiler-Directed Dynamic Frequency and Voltage Scaling. In Workshop on Power-Aware Computer Systems, ASPLOS-IX, November 2000.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C.-H. Hsu, U. Kremer, and M. Hsiao. Compiler-Directed Dynamic Frequency/Voltage Scheduling for Energy Reduction in Microprocessors. In Proceedings of the 2001International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, ISLPED’01, pages 275–278, August 2001.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Huang, J. Renau, S.-M. Yoo, and J. Torrellas. A Framework for Dynamic Energy Efficiency and Temperature Management. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 202–213, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Intel Corporation. Intel XScale Microarchitecture Technical Summary. Technical report, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Iyer and D. Marculescu. Power aware microarchitecture resource scaling. In Proceedings of 2000 Design Automation and Test in Europe, pages 190–196, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. KleinOsowski, J. Flynn, N. Meares, and D. J. Lilja. Adapting the SPEC2000 Benchmark Suite for Simulation-Based Computer Architecture Research. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Workload Characterization, International Conference on Computer Design, September 2000.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Kuck, R. Kuhn, D. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. J. Wolfe. Dependence graphs and compiler optimizations. In Conference Record of the Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Principles of Programming Languages, Jan. 1981.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. R. Lebeck, X. Fan, H. Zeng, and C. Ellis. Power Aware Page Allocation. In Ninth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 105–116, November 2000.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    T. Pering, T. Burd, and R. Brodersen. Voltage scheduling in the lparm microprocessor system. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, ISLPED’00, pages 96–101, July 2000.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M.D. Powell, S.-H. Yang, B. Falsafi, K. Roy, and T.N. Vijaykumar. Gated-Vdd: A circuit technique to reduce leakage in cache memories. In ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED’00)., pages 90–95, July 2000.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M.D. Powell, S.-H. Yang, B. Falsafi, K. Roy, and T.N. Vijaykumar. Reducing leakage in a high-performance deep-submicron instruction cache. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 9(1):77–89, February 2001.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Sanchez, B. Kuttanna, T. Olson, M. Alexander, G. Gerosa, R. Philip, and J. Alvarez. Thermal Management System for High Performance PowerPC Microprocessors. In Proceedings IEEE Compcon, page 325, February 1997.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. M. Stallman. Using and Porting GNUCC, 1995.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Stanley-Marbell and M. Hsiao. Fast, flexible, cycle-accurate energy estimation. In ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, ISLPED’01., pages 141–146, August 2001.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    V. Tiwari and M. Lee. Power analysis of a 32-bit embedded microcontroller. In Proceedings, Asia and south Pacific DAC, pages (CD-ROM), August 1995.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    F. Yao, A. Demers, and S. Shenker. A scheduling model for reduced cpu energy. In Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 374–382, October 1995.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. Ye, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. Kandemir, and M. J. Irwin. The Design and Use of SimplePower: A Cycle-Accurate Energy Estimation Tool. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Design Automation, pages 340–345, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip Stanley-Marbell
    • 1
  • Michael S. Hsiao
    • 2
  • Ulrich Kremer
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of ECECarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh
  2. 2.Dept. of ECEVirginia TechBlacksburg
  3. 3.Dept. of Computer ScienceRutgers UniversityPiscataway

Personalised recommendations