Implementing Inclusive Design: The Discrepancy between Theory and Practice

  • Hua Dong
  • Simeon Keates
  • P. John Clarkson
  • Julia Cassim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2615)

Abstract

The theory of inclusive design tends to require user involvement and iterative assessment throughout the whole design process. However, in an industrial context, companies are restricted by design constraints such as time and cost. Through investigating eight projects focusing on inclusive design, the authors highlight discrepancies between theoretical models and industry practice and analyse the underlying reasons. Related issues such as bottom-up design approaches and estimates of design exclusion are also discussed. It is concluded that a change of attitudes towards people with disabilities by people commissioning, as well as performing, design and the provision of design support tools are necessary to bring inclusive design theory and practice closer together.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 4.
    Clarkson, P. J., Keates, S., Quantifying Design Exclusion. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., Robinson, P. (eds.): Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Spinger-Verlag, London (2002) 23–32Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Dong, H., Cardoso, C., Cassim, J., Keates, S., Clarkson, P. J.: Inclusive Design: Reflections on Design Practice. Technical report of Cambridge Engineering Department, CUED/C-EDC/TR118-June 2002Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Goldsmith, S., Designing for the Disabled: The New Paradigm. Architectural press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Goldsmith, S., The Bottom-up Methodology of Universal Design. In: Preiser Wolfgang, F., E., Ostroff, E., (eds.): Universal Design Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, P. J., Countering Design Exclusion. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., Robinson, P. (eds.): Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Spinger-Verlag, London (2002) 33–42Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Law, C., M., Barnicle, K., Vanderheiden, G. C.: Usability Testing of People with Disabilities: Where Do You Begin. At: http://www.adptnev.org/21century/proceedings3php#5E2 (2000)
  7. 10.
    Lawson, R.: How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified (3rd edn.) Architectural Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Pirkl, J. J.: Transgenerational Design: Products for an Aging Population. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Säde, S.: Towards User-Centred Design: Method Development Project in a Product Design Consultancy. The Design Journal. Vol. 4, Issue 3. Hobbs the Printers, Totton (2001) 20–32Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Stanton, N.: Key Topics in Consumer Products. In: Stanton, N. (ed.) Human Factors in Consumer Products. Taylor & Francis, Padstow (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Vanderheiden G., Vanderheiden K., and Tobias, J., Universal Design Motivators and Facilitators. At: http://www.adpatenev.org/21century/proceedings4.php#6F1

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hua Dong
    • 1
  • Simeon Keates
    • 1
  • P. John Clarkson
    • 1
  • Julia Cassim
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering Design Centre, Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.The Helen Hamlyn Research CentreRoyal College of ArtLondonUK

Personalised recommendations