Relating Structure and Dynamics in Organisation Models

  • Catholijn M. Jonker
  • Jan Treur
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2581)


To understand how an organisational structure relates to dynamics is an interesting fundamental challenge in the area of social modelling. Specifications of organisational structure usually have a diagrammatic form that abstracts from more detailed dynamics. Dynamic properties of agent systems, on the other hand, are often specified in the form of a set of logical formulae in some temporal language. This paper addresses the question how these two perspectives can be combined in one framework. It is shown how for different aggregation levels within an organisation structure, sets of dynamic properties can be specified. Organisational structure provides a structure of interlevel relationships between these multiple sets of dynamic properties. Thus organisational structure relates to specification of the dynamics of organisational behaviour. As an illustration, for Ferber and Gutknecht’s AGR organisation modelling approach it is shown how a foundation can be obtained for integrated specification of both structure and dynamic properties of an organisation.


Organisational Structure Dynamic Property Multiagent System State Ontology Logical Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amiguet, M., Müller, J.-P., Baez-Barranco, J.-A., and Nagy, A., (2003), The MOCA Platform Simulated the Dynamics of Social Networks. This volume.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barringer, H., Fisher, M., Gabbay, D., Owens, R., and Reynolds, M., (1996). The Imperative Future: Principles of Executable Temporal Logic, Research Studies Press Ltd. and John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazier, F.M.T., Eck, P.A.T. van, and Treur, J., (2001). Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation. Journal of Applied Intelligence, vol. 14, pp. 161–178.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edmonds, B., (2003), Towards an Ideal Social Simulation Language. This volume.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engelfriet, J., Jonker, C.M., and Treur, J. (2002). Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems in Temporal Multi-Epistemic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 11: 195–22.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferber, J. and Gutknecht, O. (1998). A meta-model for the analysis and design of organisations in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’98), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 128–135.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferber, J., and Gutknecht, O. (1999). Operational Semantics of a role-based agent architecture. Proceedings of the 6th Int. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL’1999). In: Jennings, N.R. & Lesperance, Y. (eds.) Intelligent Agents VI, Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 1757, Springer Verlag, 2000, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Jonker, C.M., Müller, J.P., and Treur, J., (2001). Organization Models and Behavioural Requirements Specification for Multi-Agent Systems. In: Y. Demazeau, F. Garijo (eds.), Multi-Agent System Organisations. Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAMAW’01, 2001. Lecture Notes in AI, Springer Verlag. To appear, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisher, M. (1994). A survey of Concurrent MetateM — the language and its applications. In: D.M. Gabbay & H.J. Ohlbach (eds.), Temporal Logic-Proceedings of the First International Conference, Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 827, pp. 480–505.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisher, M., and M. Wooldridge (1997). On the formal specification and verification of multi-agent systems. International Journal of Co-operative Information Systems, vol. 6, pp. 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hannoun, M., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O., and Sayettat, C., Dependence Relations between Roles in a Multi-Agent System: Towards the Detection of Inconsistencies in Organization. In: J.S. Sichman, R. Conte, and N. Gilbert (eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (Proc. of the 1st. International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, MABS’98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1534, Springer-Verlag Berlin-Alemanha, 1998, pp. 169–182.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hannoun, M., Boissier, O., Sichman, J.S., and Sayettat, C., MOISE: An organizational model for multi-agent systems. In: M. C. Monard and J. S. Sichman (eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence, (Proc. International Joint Conference 7th. Ibero-American Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IBERAMIA’00) and 15th. Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA’00), Atibaia, Brasil). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1952, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000, pp. 152–161.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herlea, D.E., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J., and Wijngaards, N.J.E., (1999). Specification of Behavioral Requirements within Compositional Multi-Agent System Design. In: F.J. Garijo, M. Boman (eds.), Multi-Agent System Engineering, Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAMAW’99. Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 1647, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999, pp. 8–27.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hubner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., and Boissier, O., A Model for the Structural, Functional and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems. In: Proc. 16th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA’02), Porto de Galinhas, Brasil, 2002. Extended abstract: MOISE+: Towards a Structural, Functional and Deontic model for MAS Organizations. In: C. Castelfranchi and W.L. Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS’02. ACM Press, 2002, pp. 501-502.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jonker, C.M., Letia, I.A., and Treur, J., (2002). Diagnosis of the Dynamics within an Organisation by Trace Checking of Behavioural Requirements. In: Wooldridge, M., Weiss, G., and Ciancarini, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, AOSE’01. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2222. Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonker, C.M. and Treur, J. (1998). Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems: a Formal Analysis of Pro-activeness and Reactiveness. In: W.P. de Roever, H. Langmaack, A. Pnueli (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Compositionality, COMPOS’97. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1536, Springer Verlag, 1998, pp. 350–380.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J., and Wijngaards, W.C.A., (2001). Temporal Languages for Simulation and Analysis of the Dynamics Within an Organisation. In: B. Dunin-Keplicz and E. Nawarecki (eds.), From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems, CEEMAS’01, 2001. Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 2296, Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kreitner, R., and Kunicki, A. (2001). Organisational Behavior, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lomi, A., and Larsen, E.R. (2001). Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organization Theories, AAAI Press, Menlo Park.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meinke, K., and Tucker J.V. (eds.) (1993). Many-sorted Logic and its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publishers-Chichester; New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organisations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moss, S., Gaylard, H., Wallis, S., and Edmonds, B. (1998). SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modelling, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4, (1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prietula, M., Gasser, L., Carley, K. (1997). Simulating Organizations. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sichman, J.S. and Conte, R., On Personal and Role Mental Attitudes: A Preliminary Dependence-Based Analysis. In: F. Oliveira (ed.), Advances in AI (Proc. 14th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, SBIA’98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1515, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Alemanha, 1998, pp 1–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catholijn M. Jonker
    • 1
  • Jan Treur
    • 2
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Artificial IntelligenceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUtrecht UniversityUtrecht

Personalised recommendations