TheContinueServer (or, How I Administered PADL 2002 and 2003)

  • Shriram Krishnamurthi
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2562)

Abstract

Conference paper submission and reviewing is an increasingly electronic activity. Paper authors and program committee members expect to be able to use software, especially with Web interfaces, to simplify and even automate many activities. Building interactive Web sites is a prime target of opportunity for sophisticated declarative programming languages. This paper describes the PLT Scheme application Continue, which automates many conference paper management tasks.

Keywords

Program Committee Functional Programming Review Form Submission Process Program Committee Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Androutsopoulos, I., J. Koutsias, K. Chandrinos, G. Paliouras and C. Spyropoulos. An evaluation of naive Bayesian anti-spam filtering, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke, E., E. Emerson and A. Sistla. Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 8(2):244–263, 1986.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Findler, R. B., J. Clements, C. Flanagan, M. Flatt, S. Krishnamurthi, P. Steckler and M. Felleisen. DrScheme: A programming environment for Scheme. Journal of Functional Programming, 12(2):159–182, 2002.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham, P. Beating the averages, April 2001. http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html.
  5. 5.
    Graham, P. Carlde Marcken: Inside Orbitz, January 2001. http://www.paulgraham.com/carl.html.
  6. 6.
    Graham, P. The other road ahead, September 2001. http://www.paulgraham.com/carl.html.
  7. 7.
    Graham, P. A plan for spam, August 2002. http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html.
  8. 8.
    Graunke, P. T., R. B. Findler, S. Krishnamurthi and M. Felleisen. Automatically restructuring programs for the Web. In IEEE International Symposium on Automated Software Engineering, pages 211–222, November 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graunke, P. T., S. Krishnamurthi, S.van der Hoeven and M. Felleisen. Programming the Web with high-level programming languages}. In European Symposium on Programming}, pages 122–136, April2Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hieb, R., R. K. Dybvig and C. Bruggeman. Representing controlin the presence of first-class continuations. In ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes, J. Generalising monads to arrows. Science of Computer Programming, 37(1–3):67–111, May 2000.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson, D. Alloy: a lightweight object modelling notation. Technical Report 797, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Feburary 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis, D. D. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In Nédellec, C. and C. Rouveirol, editors, Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4–15. Springer-Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nierstrasz, O. Identify the champion. In Harrison, N., B. Foote and H. Rohnert, editors, Pattern Languages of Program Design, volume 4, pages 539–556. Addison-Wesley, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Queinnec, C. The influence of browsers on evaluators or, continuations to program web servers. In ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sahami, M., S. Dumais, D. Heckerman and E. Horvitz. A Bayesian approach to filtering junk email. In AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, July 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spolsky, J. User interface design for programmers. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/fog0000000249.html.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Welsh, N., F. Solsona and I. Glover. SchemeUnit and SchemeQL: Two little languages. In Scheme and Functional Programming, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shriram Krishnamurthi
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations