Information Systems That Also Project into the Future

  • Gio Wiederhold
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2544)


We study requirements to make information systems used for decision-making support effective. Lacking today is support for projection within these systems: the action that a decision maker initiates has effects in the future, and these must be assessed. Information systems however, focus on the past, and leave projection to be performed either by the decision makers intuition, or to a variety of tools that are not well integrated. After enumerating needed functions, we present concepts needed for an adequate infrastructure. We then describe some research that has demonstrated a capability for integrating output from spreadsheets and other simulations into information systems. We close by indicating research and development direction that should be pursued to make the vision of information systems that can also project into the future a reality.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [BenHaim:01]
    Yakov Ben-Haim: Information-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty; Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. [BettiniWJ:96]
    C. Bettini, X.S. Wang, and Sushil Jajodia: “Testing complex temporal relationships involving multiple Granularities and its application to Data Mining”; Proc. ACM SIGMOD/PODS 1996, ACM, pp.67–78.Google Scholar
  3. [BhatnagarK:86]
    Bhatnagar and L.N. Kanal: “Handling Uncertain Information: A Review of Numeric and Non-numeric Methods”; in Kanal and Lemmer(eds.): Uncertainty in AI, North-Holland publishers, 198Google Scholar
  4. [Charles:99]
    John Charles: “Middleware Moves to the Forefront”; IEEE Computer Magazine, Vol.32no.5, May 1999, pages 17–19.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [ChajewskaEa:98]
    U. Chajewska, L. Getoor, J. Norman, & Y. Shahar. Utility Elicitation as a Classification Problem. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, Wisconsin, 79–88. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. [Connolly:97]
    Dan Connolly (ed.): XML: Principles, Tools, and Techniques; O'Reilly, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. [DasSTM:94]
    A.K. Das, Y. Shahar, S.W. Tu, and M.A. Musen: “A temporal-abstraction mediator for protocol-based decision support”; Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medicine, Washington DC, Hanley & Belfus 1994, pp.320–324.Google Scholar
  8. [DavidianC:87]
    Marie Davidian and Raymond Carroll: Variance Function Estimation; Jo. American Statistical Ass. vol 82, 1987 pp.1079–1092MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [DeyS:96]
    Debabrata Dey and Sumit Sarkar: “A probabilistic relational model and algebra”; ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Vol.21 No.3, Sep. 1996, pp: 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [DeZegherGeetsEa:88]
    Isabelle DeZegher-Geets, Andrew G. Freeman, Michael G. Walker, Robert L. Blum, and Gio Wiederhold: “Summarization and Display of On-line Medical Records”; M.D. Computing, Vol.5 No.3, March 1988, pp.38–46.Google Scholar
  11. [DomshlakB:02]
    Carmel Domshlak and Ronen I. Brafman: “Structure and Complexity of Planning with Unary Operators”; Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning & Scheduling (AIPS-02); 2002.Google Scholar
  12. [FishwickH:98]
    Paul Fishwick and David Hill, eds: 1998 International Conference on Web-Based Modeling & Simulation; Society for Computer Simulation, Jan 1998,
  13. [GarciaMolinaBP:92]
    Hector Garcia-Molina, D. Barbara, and D. Porter: “The Management of Probabilistic Data”; IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 5, October 1992, pp. 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [GaudiotB:91]
    J.-L. Gaudiot and L. Bic (eds.): Advanced Topics in Data-Flow Computing; Prentice-Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [GershwinH:34]
    Ira Gershwin and Du Bose Heyward: Porgy and Bess; 1934, Act II, scene 2.Google Scholar
  16. [GustafsonEa:01]
    David Gustafson, P. Johnson, T. Molfenter, T. Patton, B. Shaw, and B. Owens: “Development and Test of a Model to Predict Adherence to a Medical Regimen”; Journal of Pharmacy Technology, in press 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [HammerEa:97]
    J. Hammer, M. Breunig, H. Garcia-Molina, S. Nestorov, V. Vassalos, R. Yerneni: “Template-Based Wrappers in the TSIMMIS System”; ACM Sigmod 26, May, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. [HammondKR: 98]
    John S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney, and Howard Raiffa: “The Hidden Traps In Decision Making”; Harvard Business Review, September-October 1998, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  19. [Jiang:96]
    Rushan Jiang: Report on the SimQL project; submitted to Prof. Wiederhold, CSD Stanford, August 1996.Google Scholar
  20. [LindenG:92]
    Ted Linden and D. Gaw 1992: “JIGSAW: Preference-directed, Co-operative Scheduling,” AAAI Spring Symposium: Practical Approaches to Scheduling and Planning, March 1992.Google Scholar
  21. [McCall:96]
    Gene McCall (editor): New World Vistas, Air and Space Power for the 21st Century; Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, April 1996, Information Technology volume, pp. 9.Google Scholar
  22. [MooreWW:01]
    Jeffrey H. Moore (Editor), Lawrence R. Weatherford, Larry R. Weatherford: Decision Modeling with Microsoft(R) Excel (6th Edition); Prentice Hall; ISBN: 013017789X; 6th edition, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. [Miller:56]
    George Miller: “The Magical Number Seven Two”; Psych.Review, Vol.68, 1956, pp.81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [MotwaniEa:02]
    Rajeev Motwani, Jennifer Widom, Arvind Arasu, Brian Babcock, Shivnath Babu, Mayur Datar. Gurmeet Manku, Chris Olston; Justin Rosenstein, and Rohit Varma: Query Processing, Approximation, and Resource Management in a Data Stream Management System; Stanford CSD Report, August 2002,
  25. [Pearl:88]
    Judea Pearl: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems; Morgan-Kaufman, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. [PerkinsP:00]
    Anthony B. Perkins and Michael C. Perkins: The Internet Bubble: Inside the Overvalued World of High-Tech Stocks — And What You Need to Know to Avoid the Coming Shakeout; HarperBusiness, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. [SalatianH:99]
    Apkar Salatian and Jim Hunter: “Deriving Trends in Historical and Real-Time Continuously Sampled Medical Data”; Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 13 No. 1/2, pp.5–8, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [Tate:96]
    Austin Tate (ed.): Advanced Planning Technology, AAAI Press, May 1996.Google Scholar
  29. [VanDieren:95]
    Wouter Van Dieren, Editor: Taking Nature Into Account: A Report to the Club of Rome; Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
  30. [Wiederhold:99]
    Gio Wiederhold: “Information Systems that Really Support Decision-making; in Ras & Skowron”: Foundations for Intelligent Systems, Springer LNAI 1609, pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
  31. [WiederholdG:97]
    Gio Wiederhold and Michael Genesereth: “The Conceptual Basis for Mediation Services”; IEEE Expert, Intelligent Systems and their Applications, Vol.12 No.5, Sep-Oct.1997.Google Scholar
  32. [WiederholdJG:98]
    Gio Wiederhold, Rushan Jiang, and Hector Garcia-Molina: “An Interface for Projecting CoAs in Support of C2”; Proc.1998 Command & Control Research & Technology Symposium, Naval Postgraduate School, June 1998, pp.549–558.Google Scholar
  33. [Wiener:93]
    Lauren Ruth Wiener: Digital Woes: Why We should Not Depend on Software; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 1993.Google Scholar
  34. [Winslett:88]
    Marianne Winslett: “Reasoning about Actions using a Possible Models Approach”; Proc 7th National AI Conference, AAAI’88, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo CA., 1988, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
  35. [Zask:00]
    Ezra Zask: “Hedge Funds, an Industry Overview”; The Journal of Alternative Investments, Winter 2000.Google Scholar
  36. [ZhugeEa:95]
    Yue Zhuge, Hector Garcia-Molina, Joachim Hammer, and Jennifer Widom: View Maintenance in a Warehousing Environment; Proc. ACM SIGMOD, May 1995, pages 316–327.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gio Wiederhold
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations