Advertisement

Neural Mechanisms of Visual Flow Integration and Segregation —Insights from the Pinna-Brelsta. Illusion and Variations of It

  • Pierre Bayerl
  • Heiko Neumann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2525)

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the cortical processing of large- field motion patterns still remain widely unclear. In particular, the integrative action of, e.g., cells and their receptive fields, their specificity, the topographic mapping of activity patterns, and the reciprocal interareal interaction needs to be investigated. We utilize a recently discovered relative motion illusion as a tool to gain insights into the neural mechanisms that underlie the integration and segregation of such motion fields occurring during navigation, steering and fixation control. We present a model of recurrent interaction of areas V1, MT, and MSTd along the dorsal cortical pathway utilizing a space-variant mapping of flow patterns. In accordance with psychophysical findings, our results provide evidence that recurrent gain control mechanisms together with the non-linear warping of the visual representation are essential to group or disambiguate motion responses. This provides further evidence for the importance of feedback interactions between cortical areas.

Keywords

Illusory Contour Dominant Direction Illusory Motion Spiral Motion Contrast Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graziano, M.S.A., Andersen, R.A., Snowden, R.J.: Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14 (1994) 54–67Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duffy, C.J., Wurtz, R.H.: Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiolgy, 65 (1991) 1329–1345Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., Pack, C.: A neural model of motion perception and visual navigation by cortical area MST. Cerebral Cortex, 9 (1999) 878–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinna, B., Brelstaff, G.J.: A new visual illusion of relative motion. Vis. Res., 40 (2000) 2091–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lappe, M.: A model of the combination of optic flow and extraretinal eye movement signals in primate extrastriate visual cortex Neural Networks, 11 (1998) 397–414Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., Viswanathan, L.: Neural dynamics of motion integration and segmentation within and across apertures. Vis. Res., 41 (2001) 2521–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sabatini, S.P., Solari, F., Carmeli, R., Cavalleri, P., Bisio, G.: A physicalist approach to first-order analysis of optic flow fields in extrastriate cortical areas. Proc. ICANN (1999) 274–279Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz, E.L.: Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: a spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding, Vis. Res., 20 (1980) 645–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz, E.L.: Computational studies of the spatial architecture of primate visual cortex. In A. Peters and K. Rocklund, editors, Cerebral Cortex, 10 (1994) 359–411Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albright, T.D., Desimone, R.: Local precision of visutopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque. Experimental Brain Research, 65 (1987) 582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qian, N., Andersen, R.A., Adelson, E.H.: Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14 (1994) 7357–7366Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bayerl, P.A.J., Neumann, H.: Cortical mechanisms of processing visual flow—Insights from the Pinna-Brelstaff illusion. Workshop Dynamic Perception (2002) in printGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grossberg, S.: How Does a Brain Build a Cognitive Code? Psychological Review, 87 (1980) 1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neumann, H., Sepp, W.: Recurrent V1-V2 interaction in early visual boundary processing Biological Cybernetics, 81 (1999) 425–444Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodman, H.R., Albright, T.D.: Coding of the visual stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque. Vis. Res., 27 (1987) 2035–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qian, N., Andersen, R.A., Adelson, E.H.: Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14 (1994) 7381–7392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Bayerl
    • 1
  • Heiko Neumann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neural Information ProcessingUniversity of UlmGermany

Personalised recommendations