Towards a Methodology for Experiments with Autonomous Agents

  • Luis Antunes
  • Helder Coelho
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2507)

Abstract

Experimental methodologies are harder to apply when selfmotivated agents are involved, especially when the issue of decision gains its due relevance in their model. Traditional experimentation has to give way to exploratory simulation, to bring insights into the design issues, not only of the agents, but of the experiment as well. The role of its designer cannot be ignored, at the risk of achieving only obvious, predictable conclusions. We propose to bring the designer into the experiment. We use the findings of extensive experimentation to compare current experimental methodologies in what concerns evaluation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Robert Axelrod. A model of the emergence of new political actors. In Artificial Societies — The Computer Simulation of Social Life. UCL Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Robert Axelrod. Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In Simulating Social Phenomena, volume 456 of LNEMS. Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Cristiano Castelfranchi. Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. In Intelligent Agents: agent theories, architectures, and languages, Proc. of ATAL’94, volume 890 of LNAI. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cristiano Castelfranchi. The theory of social functions: challenges for computational social science and multi-agent learning. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    John L. Casti. Would-be business worlds. Complexity, 6(2), 2001.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Paul R. Cohen. A survey of the eighth national conf. on AI: Pulling together or pulling apart? AI Magazine, 12(1):16–41, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Paul R. Cohen. Empirical Methods for AI. The MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Rosaria Conte and Nigel Gilbert. Introduction: computer simulation for social theory. In Artificial Societies: the computer simulation of social life. UCL Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    António Damásio. Descartes’ error. Putnam’s sons, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Nigel Gilbert. Models, processes and algorithms: Towards a simulation toolkit. In Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation. Physica-Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nigel Gilbert and Jim Doran, editors. Simulating Societies: the computer simulation of social phenomena. UCL Press, London, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    David Hales. Tag Based Co-operation in Artificial Societies. PhD thesis, Univ. Essex, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Herbert A. Simon. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69:99–118, Feb. 1955.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Klaus G. Troitzsch. Social science simulation — origins, prospects, purposes. In Simulating Social Phenomena, volume 456 of LNEMS. Springer, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Antunes
    • 1
  • Helder Coelho
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations