Extending the Computational Study of Social Norms with a Systematic Model of Emotions

  • Ana L. C. Bazzan
  • Diana F. Adamatti
  • Rafael H. Bordini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2507)

Abstract

It is generally recognized that the use of emotions plays an important role in human interactions, for it leads to more flexible decision-making. In the present work, we extend the idea presented in a paper by Castelfranchi, Conte, and Paolucci, by employing a systematic and detailed model of emotion generation. A scenario is described in which agents that have various types of emotions make decisions regarding compliance with a norm. We compare our results with the ones achieved in previous simulations and we show that the use of emotions leads to a selective behavior which increases agent performance, considering that different types of emotions cause agents to have different acting priorities.

Keywords

Social norms Emotions and personality Multiagent-based simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Bates. The role of emotion in believable agents. In Communications of the ACM, Special Issue on Agents, July, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. L. Bazzan and R. H. Bordini. A framework for the simulation of agents with emotions: Report on experiments with the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. In J. P. Müller, E. Andre, S. Sen, and C. Frasson, editors, Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2001), 28 May–1 June, Montreal, Canada, pages 292–299. ACM Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. L. Bazzan, R. H. Bordini, and J. A. Campbell. Moral sentiments in multi-agent systems. In J. P. Müller, M. P. Singh, and A. S. Rao, editors, Intelligent Agents V, Proceedings of ATAL-98, number 1555 in LNAI, pages 113–131, Heidelberg, 1999. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. Castelfranchi and R. Conte. Understanding the effects of norms in social groups through simulation. In G. N. Gilbert and R. Conte, editors, Artificial Societies: the computer simulation of social life, pages 252–267. UCL Press, London, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Castelfranchi, R. Conte, and M. Paolucci. Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(3), 1998. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/3.html.
  6. [6]
    A. Damasio. Descartes’s Error. Avon, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Elliott. Multi-media communication with emotion-driven believable agents. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Believable Agents, Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, March 21–23, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. James. What is an emotion? Mind, 9:188–205, 1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. James. The Principles of Psychology. Holt, New York, 1890.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Ortony, G. L. Clore, and A. Collins. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.W. Picard. Affective Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Staller and P. Petta. Introducing emotions into the computational study of social norms: A first evaluation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(1), 2001. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/1/2.html.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana L. C. Bazzan
    • 1
  • Diana F. Adamatti
    • 1
  • Rafael H. Bordini
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de InformáticaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations