Modeling Coordination and Control in Cross-Organizational Workflows

  • Enzo Colombo
  • Chiara Francalanci
  • Barbara Pernici
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2519)

Abstract

Current e-service technology paradigms require the analysis and conceptual modeling of cooperative inter-organizational workflows. Cooperation among different organizations is based on contractual agreements that coordinate production activities among cooperating companies and establish mechanisms to control the fulfillment of production goals. Existing conceptual models of workflows do not provide constructs and related methodological guidelines to support the high-level conceptual modeling of coordination and control activities. This paper presents a model that helps specifying patterns of control and coordination among different cooperating actors and associating corresponding contractual rules. Patterns are organized along a continuum between hierarchical and market control and coordination paradigms. The model is explained based on an example showing the fundamental differences between hierarchical and market coordination and control. It is also shown how operating flows change as coordination and control shift from hierarchical to market patterns, due to varying contractual rules for cooperation in executing operating activities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelov, S., Grefen, P.: B2B eContract Handling-A Survey of Projects, Papers and Standards. University of Twente, The Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arrow, K. J.: The limits of organization. W W Norton & Company (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buschmann et al.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture. A System of Patterns, John Wiley & Sons Ltd (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T. W., Gurbaxani, V., Kambil, A.: Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms? Management Science (1994) 40(12) 1628–1645.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casati F., Castano S., Fugini M., Mirbel I., Pernici B.: Using pattern to Design Rules in Workflows. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, (2000) 26(8) 760–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castro J., Kolp M., Mylopoulos J.: Towards Requirement-Driven Information Systems Engineering: The Tropos Project (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coase, R. H.: The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics (1960) 3 1–44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Michelis, G., Dubois, E., Jarke, M., Matthes, F., Mylopoulos, J., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K., Schmidt, J., Woo, C., Yu, E. (eds.): Cooperative Information Systems: A Manifesto, Cooperative Information Systems: trends & Directions, M.P. Papazoglou, G. Schlageter, (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galbraith, J. R.: Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York (NY) (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galbraith, J.R.: Designing Organizations. An executive briefing on strategy, structure and process. Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco (1995).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casati F., Fugini M.G., Mirbel I., Pernici B.: WIRES, a methodology for developing workflow applications. Requirements Engineering Journal (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kafeza E., Chiu D., Kafeza I.: View-Based Contracts in an E-Service Cross-Organizational Workflow Environment. TES 2001, LNCS 2193, 74–88. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2001).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malone, T. W.: Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets. Management Science (1987) 33(10) 1317–1332.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malone, T. W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (1994) 26(1), 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malone, T. W.: Is Empowerment Just a Fad? Control, Decision Making and IT. Sloan Management Review (1997) 38(2), 23–35.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R. J.: The Dawn of the E-lance Economy. Harvard Business Review, (1998) 76(5), 144–152.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B.: Tools for Inventing Organizations: Towards a Handbook of Organizational Processes. Management Science (1999) 45(3), 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang J., Papazouglou M.P., van den Heuvel W.: Tackling the Challenges of Services Composition in E-Marketplaces, RIDE 2002Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang J., Papazoglou M.P.: Web Component: A Substrate for Web Service Reuse and Composition. CAiSE 2002: 21–36Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papazouglou M., Delis A., Bouguettaya A., Haghjoo M.:. Class Library for Workflow Environments and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Computers (1997) 46 (6), 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott, W. R.: Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall, 3rd ed (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williamson, O. E:. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York (NY) (1975).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Workflow Management Coalition. WfMC Handbook (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, E., Du Bois, Ph., Dubois, E., Mylopoulos, J.: From organizational models to system requirements-a cooperating agents’ approach. Proc. of the 3rd International Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (1995).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Using goal, rules and methods to support reasoning in business process reengineering. International Journal of Intelligent Systems an Accounting, Finance and Management (1996) 5(1) 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enzo Colombo
    • 1
  • Chiara Francalanci
    • 1
  • Barbara Pernici
    • 1
  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoDepartment of Electronics and InformationMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations