Computational Modeling of the Cardiovascular System After Fontan Procedure

  • Eun Bo Shim
  • Chan Hyun Youn
  • Thomas Heldt
  • Roger D. Kamm
  • Roger G. Mark
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2526)


In this study, a computational method is presented to simulate the hemodynamics of patients after the Fontan procedure. The short-term feedback control models are implemented to assess the hemodynamic responses of the patients exposed to stresses such as gravity or hemorrhage. To construct the base line state of the Fontan model, we assume an increase in venous tone, an increase in heart rate, and an increase in systemic resistance all of which are based on clinical observations. For the verification of the present method we simulate a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) test and hemorrhage (20% blood volume loss). Both simulation results are compared to experimental data from the literature. Furthermore, it is shown that cardiac output decreases when the shunt resistance increases.


Systemic Resistance Lower Body Negative Pressure Shunt Resistance Lump Parameter Model Fontan Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fontan, F., and Baudet, E., 1971, “Sugical repair of tricuspid atresia,” Thorax, Vol. 26, pp. 240–248.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gale, A. W., Danielsson, G. K., McGoon, D. C., and Mair, D. D., 1979, “Modified Fontan operation for univentricular heart and complicated congenital lesions,” J. Thorac. Cardiovas. Surg., Vol. 78, pp. 831–838.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pennati G, Migliavacca F, Dubini G, Pietrabissa R, Fumero R, de Leval MR., “Use of mathematical model to predict hemodynamics in cavopulmonary anastomosis with persistent forward flow,” J Surg Res. 2000 Mar;89(1):43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rydberg, A., Teien, D. E., and Krus, P., 1997, “Computer simulation in patient with total cavo-pulmonary connection: inter-relationship of cardiac and vascular pressure,” flow, resistence and capacitance, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., Vol. 35, pp. 722–728.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heldt T, Shim EB, Kamm RD, Mark RG., “Computational modeling of cardiovascular response to orthostatic stress,” J Appl Physiol 2002 Mar;92(3):1239–54Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bull, C., de Leval M. R., and Stark, J., 1983, “Use of a subpulmonary ventricular chamber in the Fontan circulation,” J. Thorac. Cardiovas. Surg., Vol. 85, pp. 21.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelley, J. R., Mack, G. W., and Fahey, J. T., 1995, “Diminished venous vascular capacitance in patients with univentricular hearts after the Fontan operations,” American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 76, pp. 158–163.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shachar, G. B., et al., 1982, “Rest and exercise hemodynamics after the Fontan procedure,” Circulation, Vol. 65, pp. 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeBoer, R. W., 1987, “Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: A beat-to-beat model,” American Journal of Physiology, Vol. 253(22), pp. H680–H689.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumada, M., Schmidt, K., Sagawa, K., and Tan, K. S., 1970, “ Carotid sinus reflex in response to hemorrhage,” Amer. J. Physiol., 243, H499–H504.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ursino, M. and Innocenti, M, 1997, “Modeling arterial hypotension during hemodialysis,” Artificial Organs, Vol. 21, 873–890.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eun Bo Shim
    • 1
  • Chan Hyun Youn
    • 2
  • Thomas Heldt
    • 3
  • Roger D. Kamm
    • 4
  • Roger G. Mark
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKumoh National University of TechnologyKumiRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Engineering, Information and Communication UniversityTaejeonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Harvard-MIT Division of Heath Science and TechnologyCambridge, MAUSA
  4. 4.Biological Engineering DivisionMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MAUSA

Personalised recommendations