Sensitivity of Stratospheric Retrievals from Radio Occultations on Upper Boundary Conditions

  • C. O. Ao
  • G. A. Hajj
  • B. A. Iijima
  • A. J. Mannucci
  • T. M. Schrøder
  • M. de la Torre Juárez
  • S. S. Leroy

Abstract

The main uncertainty in the stratospheric retrievals from GPS radio occultation (RO) measurements comes from the lack of reliable measurements in the upper stratosphere and above where the bending due to the neutral atmosphere is weak and residual ionospheric effects are strong. In this work, we quantify the bias and uncertainty of the refractivity and temperature retrievals due to different upper boundary strategies using a simulation study. We use refractivity profile derived from lidar pressure and temperature profiles as the input states in generating the synthetic occultations. Random noise levels commensurate with the CHAMP RO measurements are added to the simulated data. We examine the sensitivity of stratospheric retrievals to two different upper boundary methods, one based on exponential extrapolation and the other on MSIS climatology. The simulation results show that both methods lead to comparable levels of temperature bias (less than 0.5 K below 30 km altitude), provided that the upper boundary heights are set above 55 km.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gobiet A, Kirchengast G (2004) Advancements of Global Navigation Satellite System radio occultation retrieval in the upper stratosphere for optimal climate monitoring utility. J Geophys Res 109, D24110, doi:10.1029/2004JD005117Google Scholar
  2. Goody R, Anderson J, North G (1998) Testing climate models: An approach. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(11):2541–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gorbunov ME (2002) Ionospheric correction and statistical optimization of radio occultation data. Radio Sci 37(5), 1084, doi:10.1029/2000RS002370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hajj GA, Ao CO, Iijima BA, Kuang D, Kursinski ER, Mannucci AJ, Meehan TK, Romans LJ, de la Torre Juárez M, Yunck TP (2004) CHAMP and SAC-C atmospheric occultation results and intercomparisons. J Geophys Res 109, D06109, doi:10.1029/2003JD003909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Healy SB (2001) Smoothing radio occultation bending angles above 40 km. Ann Geophys 19:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hocke K (1997) Inversion of GPS meteorology data. Ann Geophys 15:443–450Google Scholar
  7. Kursinski ER, Hajj GA, Schofield JT, Linfield RP, Hardy KR (1997) Observing Earth’s atmosphere with radio occultation measurements using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 102(D19):23429–23465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leblanc T, McDermid IS (2001) Quasi-biennial oscillation signatures in ozone and temperature observed by lidar at Mauna Loa, Hawaii (19.5°N, 155.6°W). J Geophys Res 106(D14):14869–14874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Picone JM, Hedin AE, Drob DP, Aikin AC (2002) NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J Geophys Res 107(A12):1468, doi:10.1029/2002JA009430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rieder MJ, Kirchengast G (2001) Error analysis and characterization of atmospheric profiles retrieved from GNSS occultation data. J Geophys Res 106(D23):31755–31770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rocken C, Anthes R, Exner M, Hunt D, Sokolovskiy S, Ware R, Gorbunov M, Schreiner W, Feng D, Herman B, Kuo YH, Zou X (1997) Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere. J Geophys Res 102(D25):29849–29866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steiner AK, Kirchengast G, Ladreiter HP (1999) Inversion, error analysis, and validation of GPS/MET occultation data. Ann Geophys 17:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. O. Ao
    • 1
  • G. A. Hajj
    • 1
  • B. A. Iijima
    • 1
  • A. J. Mannucci
    • 1
  • T. M. Schrøder
    • 1
  • M. de la Torre Juárez
    • 1
  • S. S. Leroy
    • 2
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Chemical BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations