Using the Purposive Behavior of Honeybees as the Basis of an Experimental Search Engine

  • Reginald L. Walker
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 29)

7 Conclusion

The usefulness of emulating the foraging behavior of active honeybee colonies as Web explorers that are reactive, proactive, and robust was shown to be feasible. The foraging behavior of honeybees exhibit a pattern of behavior that is directed toward achieving a specific purpose: the maintaince of a dynamic environment map/localized view of hive’s ecosystem. The dynamic nature of Internet user traffic patterns provides ideal environmental conditions that result in stochastic information within WWW.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berners-Lee T, Cailliau R, Groff J, Pollermann B (1992) Electronic Networking: Research, Applications and Policy l(l):74–82Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark O, Kok R (1995) The study of ecosystem dynamics using simulation. In: Proc of Canadian Society of Agricultural Institute of Canada Annual ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dill S, Kumar R, McCurley K, Rajagopalan S, Sivakumar D, Tomkins A (2001) ACM Trans. on Internet Technology (TOIT) 2(3):205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Eicken T, Culler DE, Goldstein SC, Schauser KE (1992) Active messages: A mechanism for integrated communication and computation. In: Proc of International Symposium on Computer ArchitectureGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eraser AS (1968) The evolution of purposive behavior. In: von Foerster H, White JD, Peterson LJ, Russell JK (eds) Purposive Systems. Spartan BooksGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Free JB (1970) The Social Organization of Honeybees. (Studies in Biology no. 81) The Camelot Press Ltd, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fritsch P (2000) Five Mellow Guys Follow Their Dream: A ‘Tall Ship’ in Brazil. In: Wall Street Journal (Western Edition), CXLII(35):Sect A:l (Col. 4), Friday, February 18, 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jung J, Sit E, Balakrishnan H, Morris R (2001) DNS performance and the effectiveness of caching. In: ACM Press, Proc of ACM SIGComm Workshop on Internet MeasurementGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindauer M (1961) Communication Among Social Bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myllymaki J (2002) Computer Networks 39:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oates MJ, Corne DW (2001) Soft Computing 5:297–312zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandalidis HG, Mavromoustakis K, Stavroulakis P (2001) Soft Computing 5:313–317zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasilakos AG, Anagnostakis KG, Pedrycz W (2001) Soft Computing 5:264–271zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker RL (2003) Emulating the honeybee information sharing model. In: Hexmoor H (ed) IEEE Press, Proc of KIMAS 2003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walker RL (2003) Tocorime Apicu: Design of an experimental search engine using an information sharing model. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walker RL (2004) Honeybee search strategies: Adaptive exploration of an in-formation ecosystem. In: IEEE Press, Proc of CEC 2004Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker RL (2004) Search engine development using evolutionary computation methodologies. In: Tan KC, Lim MH, Yao X, Wang L (eds) Recent Advances in Simulated Evolution and Learning. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walker RL (2005) Journal of Network and Computer Applications 28(2):77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reginald L. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Tapicu, Inc.Los Angeles

Personalised recommendations