Computer Recognition Systems pp 595-601 | Cite as
Clustering DNA Microarray Data
Abstract
Proper interpretation of results of clustering of gene expression data from DNA microarray tests is one of major challenges in experiment data analysis. Interpretation problems arise due to the fact that different algorithms tend to produce different results, while some clusters appear to be invariant of an algorithm applied. A procedure described in this work can be a good starting point for a decision making process to evaluate biological relevance of clustering results obtained. In our view, any other similar approach aiming to discover biologically relevant clusters will have to include biological information. It would be probably beneficial if relevant biological knowledge could be incorporated on the input side of clustering algorithm rather than at the results post processing / interpretation stage, as described in this work. Making clustering algorithms make clustering decision biased towards biologically relevant groupings, thus forming ‘supervised clustering’ approach may be a motivation for further research in this area.
Keywords
Cluster Algorithm Average Linkage FMR1 Gene Experiment Data Analysis Cluster Gene ExpressionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Art D, Gnanadesikan R, Kettenring R (1982) Data-based Metrics for Cluster Analysis. Utilitas Mathematica 21A:75–99MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Brown M, et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Eisen M, et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14863–14868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Everitt B (1980) Cluster Analysis, Second Edition. Heineman Educational Books Ltd., LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ewens W, Grant G (2001) Statistical Methods in Bioinformatics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Faller D, et al. (2003) Journal of Computational Biology 10:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2002) The Elements of Statistical Learning. Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hoffmann R, Seidl T, Dugas M (2002) Profound effect of normalization on detection of differently expressed genes in oligonucleotide microarray data analysis. Genome BiologyGoogle Scholar
- 9.Quackenbush J (2001) Nature Reviews Genetics 2:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Shannon W, Culverhouse R, Duncann J (2003) Pharmacogenomics 4:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Tamayo P, et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2907–2912CrossRefGoogle Scholar