Advertisement

Baseline and Acceleration Episodes - Clinically Significant Nonstationarities in FHR Signal: Part II. Indirect Comparison

  • Janusz Jezewski
  • Krzysztof Horoba
  • Adam Matonia
Part of the Advances in Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 30)

Abstract

The analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) trace is not based on evaluation of the baseline itself, but on the episodes which have been detected using this baseline - the acceleration (A) and deceleration (D) patterns. This implies the following approach: for a given trace the baseline is estimated automatically according to the algorithm selected, and once again manually by the clinical expert. For each baseline the A/D patterns are identified automatically by the fixed recognition algorithm. In the next step, the baseline interference procedure is used, which ensures constant difference between the primary baseline and the baseline with the interference superimposed. This difference corresponds to the average expertŠs inconsistency. The goal was to check the correlation between the inconsistencies of baselines and A/D episodes. The obtained results gave a proof that two baselines (from two different automated estimation methods) must be compared indirectly, solely on the basis of the A/D recognized when using them.

Keywords

Clinical Expert Fetal Heart Rate Indirect Comparison Baseline Algorithm Fetal Heart Rate Variability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arduini D, Rizzo G, Giannini F, Garzetti GG, Romanini C (1993) Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate: II. Comparison with the interpretation of experts. J. Matern. Fetal Invest. 3: 165–168Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gagnon R, Campbell MK, Hunse C (1993) A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. Am. J. Obstet. Gymecol. 168: 842–847Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jezewski J, Wrobel J, Horoba K (2002) Fetal heart rate variability: clinical experts versus computerized system interpretation. In: Proc. of 24th Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, 1617–1618Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rooth G (1987) Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 25: 159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janusz Jezewski
    • 1
  • Krzysztof Horoba
    • 1
  • Adam Matonia
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Medical Technology and EquipmentZabrzePoland

Personalised recommendations