Establishment and Maintenance of DNA Methylation Patterns in Mammals
In mammals, CpG methylation patterns are established and maintained during development by the Dnmt1 and Dnmt3 families of DNA methyltransferases. These enzymes share conserved catalytic motifs in their C-terminal regions, but have unique N-terminal regulatory domains. Studies over the past several years have shed light on the molecular mechanisms by which DNA methylation patterns are regulated. This review focuses on recent advances in defining the functional domains of DNA methyltransferases and identifying interacting proteins that may contribute to the functional specializations of these enzymes.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brenner C, Deplus R, Didelot C, Loriot A, Vire E, De Smet C, Gutierrez A, Danovi D, Bernard D, Boon T, Pelicci PG, Amati B, Kouzarides T, de Launoit Y, Di Croce L, Fuks F (2005) Myc represses transcription through recruitment of DNA methyltransferase corepressor. EMBO J 24:336–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fatemi M, Hermann A, Pradhan S, Jeltsch A (2001) The activity of the murine DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 is controlled by interaction of the catalytic domain with the N-terminal part of the enzyme leading to an allosteric activation of the enzyme after binding to methylated DNA. J Mol Biol 309:1189–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grignani F, De Matteis S, Nervi C, Tomassoni L, Gelmetti V, Cioce M, Fanelli M, Ruthardt M, Ferrara FF, Zamir I, Seiser C, Lazar MA, Minucci S, Pelicci PG (1998) Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-alpha recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature 391:815–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ling Y, Sankpal UT, Robertson AK, McNally JG, Karpova T, Robertson KD (2004) Modification of de novo DNA methyltransferase 3a (Dnmt3a) by SUMO-1 modulates its interaction with histone deacetylases (HDACs) and its capacity to repress transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 32:598–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinberg RA(1995) The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81:323–330Google Scholar