Advertisement

Description of PrognAus for Windows 2.2

  • Thomas Ledermann
Chapter

Abstract

Users of forest growth simulators are often faced with specific problems requiring a growth simulator with specific capabilities. Because of the great variety among the existing growth simulators, it is not always an easy endeavour to find an appropriate one. In this situation a standardised description is very helpful. The description of the growth simulator PrognAus for Windows 2.2 follows the recommendations of the German Association of Forest Research Institutions for the standardised documentation and further development of forest growth simulators. It should facilitate the comparison of various growth simulators and help potential users to find the appropriate simulator for their specific needs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eckmüllner O, Sterba H (2002) Erweiterte Einzelstammsortentafel für Fichte. Österreichisches FORST-Jahrbuch 2002. Österreichischer Agrarverlag, Wien, pp 163–173Google Scholar
  2. Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt (1981) Instruktionen für die Feldarbeit der Österreichischen Forstinventur 1981–1985. Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt, Wien, 173 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Hasenauer H (2000) Die simultanen Eigenschaften von Waldwachstumsmodellen. Blackwell, Berlin, 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Hasenauer H, Monserud RA (1996) A crown ratio model for Austrian forests. For Ecol Manage 84:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Krajicek JE, Brinkmann KE, Gingrich SF (1961) Crown competition — a measure of density. For Sci 7:35–42Google Scholar
  6. Ledermann T (2002a) Ein Einwuchsmodell aus den Daten der Österreichischen Waldinventur 1981–1996. Centralbl Ges Forstwesen 119:40–77Google Scholar
  7. Ledermann T (2002b) Using logistic regression to model tree selection preferences for harvesting in forests in conversion. In: von Gadow K, Nagel J, Saborowski J (eds) Managing forest ecosystems: continuous cover forestry — assessment, analysis, scenarios, vol 4. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–216Google Scholar
  8. Ledermann T (2003) Implementierung eines Waldwachstumsmodells zur Nachhaltskontrolle. Dissertation, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien, 153 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Ledermann T, Eckmüllner O (2004) A method to attain uniform resolution of the competition variable Basal-Area-in-Larger Trees (BAL) during forest growth projections of small plots. Ecol Modelling 171:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Monserud RA, Sterba H (1996) A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even-and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For Ecol Manage 80:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Monserud RA, Sterba H (1999) Modeling individual tree mortality for Austrian forest species. For Ecol Manage 113:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Monserud RA, Sterba H, Hasenauer H (1997) The single-tree stand growth simulator PROGNAUS. In: Teck R, Moer M, Adams J (eds) Proc Forest Vegetation Simulator Conf, 3–7 Feb, Fort Collins, Colorado. Gen Tech Rep INT-GTR-373. USDA Forest Services International Research Station, Ogden, Utah, pp 50–56Google Scholar
  13. SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6, 4th edn. Vol 1/2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 1789 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Schieler K (1997) Methode der Zuwachsberechnung der Österreichischen Waldinventur. Dissertation, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien, 92 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Söderbergh I, Ledermann T (2003) Algorithms for simulating thinning and harvesting in five European individual-tree growth simulators: a review. Comput Electron Agric 39:115–140Google Scholar
  16. Sterba H (1995) PROGNAUS — ein abstandsunabhängiger Wachstumssimulator für ungleichaltrige Mischbestände. In: Kenk G. (ed) Deutscher Verband Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten-Sektion Ertragskunde: Beiträge zur Jahrestagung 1999 in Joachimstal, DVFFA, Freiburg, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  17. Sterba H (1999) PROGNAUS — ein Validierungsbeispiel. In: Kenk G (ed) Deutscher Verband Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten-Sektion Ertragskunde: Beiträge zur Jahrestagung 1999 in Volpriehausen, DVFFA, Freiburg, pp 24–32Google Scholar
  18. Sterba H (2000) Uneven-aged forest management, does it combine sustainability and pro-ductivity? In: Jandl R, Devall M, Khorchidi M, Schimof E, Wolfrum G, Krishnapillay B (eds) Forests and society: the role of research. Proc 21st IUFRO World Congr, Abstracts of group discussions, vol 11. IUFRO, Vienna, p 92Google Scholar
  19. Sterba H, Monserud RA (1996) Validation of the single tree stand growth simulator PROGNAUS with permanent plot data. In: Köhl M, Gertner GZ (eds) Caring for the forest: research in a changing world. Statistics, mathematics and computers. Proc 20th IUFRO World Conf, 6–12 Aug 1995, Tampere, Finland, S 4.11-00. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL/FNP), Birmensdorf, pp 36–49Google Scholar
  20. Sterba H, Monserud RA (1997) Applicability of the forest stand growth simulator PROGNAUS for the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif. Ecol Modelling 98:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sterba H, Ledermann T (2000) Growth models to control sustainability of forests in transition. In: Baskaran K, Soepadmo E, Arshad NL, Wong HHA, Appanah S, Suhami WC, Manokrana N, Tong HL, Choon KK (eds) Forests and society: the role of research. Proc 21st IUFRO World Congr. Sub Plenary Sessions 1:267Google Scholar
  22. Sterba H, Kleine M, Eckmüllner O (1986) Sortentafeln für Tanne, Lärche, Kiefer und Buche. Österreichischer Agrarverlag, Wien, 182 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Sterba H, Golser M, Moser M, Schadauer K (2000) A timber harvesting model for Austria. Comput Electron Agric 28:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sterba H, Korol N, Rössler G (2001) Ein Ansatz zur Evaluierung eines Einzelbaumwachstumssimulators für Fichtenreinbestände. Forstwiss Centralbl 120:406–421Google Scholar
  25. Vospernik S (2004) Modelle für Holzgüteklassen und Stammschäden. Dissertation, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien, 151 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Wykoff WR (1990) A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the northern Rocky Mountains. For Sci 36:1077–1104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Ledermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture, Federal Research and Training Centre for ForestsNatural Hazards and Landscape (BFW)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations