Advertisement

Emotion and Cognition in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Neuroimaging

  • Joshua Greene
Part of the Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences book series (NEUROSCIENCE)

Summary

Traditional theories of moral psychology emphasize reasoning and “higher cognition,” while more recent work emphasizes the role of emotion. In this article, I discuss neuroimaging data that support a theory of moral judgment according to which both “cognitive” and emotional processes play crucial and sometimes mutually competitive roles. These data suggest that brain regions associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) are recruited to resolve difficult moral dilemmas in which utilitarian values require “personal” moral violations, violations associated with increased activity in brain regions associated with emotion and social cognition (medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex, temporal poles, and the amygdala). We have also found that brain regions including the anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortices predict inter-trial differences in moral judgment behavior, exhibiting greater activity for utilitarian judgments. I speculate that our emerging psychological and neuroscientific understanding of moral judgment may influence our responses to real-world moral dilemmas.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolphs, R (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 165–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1998) The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 393: 470–474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G (2000) Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 267–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allman J, Hakeem A, Watson K (2002) Two phylogenetic specializations in the human brain. Neuroscientist 8: 335–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio A R (1999) Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci 2: 1032–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aquinas T (1988) Of killing. In: Baumgarth WP, Regan RJ (eds) On law, morality, and politics. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Co., pp. 226–227.Google Scholar
  7. Bargh JA, Chartrand T. (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. Am Psychol 54:, 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10: 295–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair RJ. (2001) Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 71: 727–731.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds) (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Raye CL, Chris Gatenby J, Gore JC, Banaji MR (2004) Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol Sci 15: 806–813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
  14. Damasio A (2003) Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer JM, Ravizza M (eds) (1992) Ethics: problems and principles. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers).Google Scholar
  16. Foot P (1978) The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. In: Virtues and vices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Goel V, Dolan RJ (2004) Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortex in inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition 93: B109–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene J. (2003) From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Rev Neurosci 4: 846–849.Google Scholar
  19. Greene JD, Sommerville R., Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 2105–2108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene JD, Nystrom LE, Engell AD, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44: 389–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108: 814–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kagan S (1989) The limits of morality. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58: 697–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kant I (1959) Foundation of the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
  25. Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Hare RD, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Brink J, Liddle PF (2001) Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiat 50: 677–684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koechlin E, Basso G, Pietrini P, Panzer S, Grafman J (1999) The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 399: 148–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F (2003) The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302: 1181–1185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohlberg L (1969) Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin DA (ed) Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
  29. Lieberman MD, Gaunt R, Gilbert DT, Trope Y (2002) Reflection and reflexion: a social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advan Exp Soc Psychol 34: 199–249.Google Scholar
  30. Maddock RJ (1999) The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends Neurosci 22: 310–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306: 503–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mill JS (1998) Utilitarianism. In: Crisp R (ed) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 167–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moll J, Eslinger PJ, Oliveira-Souza R (2001) Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional mri results in normal subjects. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 59: 657–664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Bramati I, Grafman J (2002a) Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage 16: 696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Eslinger PJ, Bramati IE, Mourao-Miranda J, Andreiuolo PA, Pessoa L (2002b) The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. J Neurosci 22: 2730–2736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Petrinovich L, O’Neill P (1996) Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethol Sociobiol 17: 145–171.Google Scholar
  38. Petrinovich L, O’Neill P, Jorgensen M (1993) An empirical study of moral intuitions: toward an evolutionary ethics. J Pers Soc Psychol 64: 467–478.Google Scholar
  39. Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I. (2002) Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16: 331–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rozin P, Lowery L, Imada S, Haidt J (1999) The cad triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). J Pers Soc Psychol 76: 574–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300: 1755–1758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Saxe R, Carey S, Kanwisher N (2004) Understanding other minds: liking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Ann Rev Psychol 55: 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence and morality. Philos Publ Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
  44. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thomson JJ (1986) Rights, restitution, and risk: essays, in moral theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart Rev Biol 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Unger PK (1996) Living high and letting die: our illusion of innocence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wrangham R, Peterson D (1996) Demonic males: apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Greene
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations