Detecting Zero-Moment Point in Legged Robot

  • H. Montes
  • S. Nabulsi
  • M. Armada


The study of Zero-moment point (ZMP) in ROBOCLIMBER (quadruped walking and climbing robot) was realized and calculated in real time during statically postural and dynamically balanced gait. Force sensor with strain gages was implemented on each foot bar of the robot in order to measure the ground reaction forces used for calculate the ZMP and to realize futures force control strategies. With the statically postural the ZMP was localized in order to know the point where the reaction force of the ground acts and so to know the distance between the geometric centre and the statically ZMP. When the robot realized one gait the ZMP was analyzed in order to identify if the ZMP was inside of support polygon. With this analysis it is possible to realize stables gaits with compliance movements.


Ground Reaction Force Geometric Centre Biped Robot Prismatic Joint Robot Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Goswami A. (1999) Postural stability of biped robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) point. The International Journal of Robotics Research 18(6):523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vukobratovic M., Borovac B., Surla D., Stokic D. (1990) Scientific Fundamentals of Robotics 7. Biped locomotion: Dynamics Stability, control, and Application. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hemami H., Golliday C.L. (1977) The inverted pendulum and biped stability. J Math. Biosci. 34(1–2):95–110Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takanishi A., Ishida M., Yamazaki Y., Kato I. (1985) The realization of dynamic walking by the biped robot WL-10RD. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Adv. Robot, 459–466, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arakawa T., Fukuda T. (1997) Natural motion generation of a biped locomotion robot using the hierarchical trajectory generation method consisting of GA, EP layers. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat. 1:211–216, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirai K., Hirose M., Haikawa Y., Takenaka T. (1998) The development of the Honda humanoid robot. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Leuvin, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vukobratovié M., Borovac B. (2004) Zero-Moment point — Thirty five years of its life. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics. 1:157–173Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nabulsi S., Armada M. (2004) Climbing strategies for remote maneuverability of ROBOCLIMBER. In: 35th International Symposium on Robotics, 23–26 March, Paris-Nord Villepinte, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armada M., Molfino R.M. (2002) Improving Working Conditions and Safety for Landslide Consolidation and Monitoring. In: Workshop on the role of CLAWAR in education, training, working conditions and safety, on CD-Rom, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anthoine P., Armada M., Carosio S., Comacchio P., Cepolina F., González P., Klopf T., Martin F., Michelini R.C., Molfino R.M., Nabulsi S., Razzoli R.P., Rizzi E., Steinicke L., Zannini R., Zoppi M. (2003) ROBOCLIMBER. In: International Workshop on Advances in Service Robotics, 13–15 March, Bardolino, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Acaccia G., Bruzzone L.E., Michelini R.C., Molfino R.M., Razzoli R.P. (2000) A tethered climbing robot for firming up high-steepness rocky walls. In: Proc. of the 6th IAS Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, 25–27 July, Venice, ItalyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Montes
    • 1
  • S. Nabulsi
    • 1
  • M. Armada
    • 1
  1. 1.Control DepartmentIndustrial Automation InstituteMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations