Semantic Web pp 273-289

Part of the X.media.press book series (XMEDIAP) | Cite as

Kollaboratives Wissensmanagement

  • Christoph Schmitz
  • Andreas Hotho
  • Robert Jäschke
  • Gerd Stumme

Zusammenfassung

Wissensmanagement in zentralisierten Wissensbasen erfordert einen hohen Aufwand für Erstellung und Wartung, und es entspricht nicht immer den Anforderungen der Benutzer. Wir geben in diesem Kapitel einen Überblick über zwei aktuelle Ansätze, die durch kollaboratives Wissensmanagement diese Probleme lösen können. Im Peer-to-Peer-Wissensmanagement unterhalten Benutzer dezentrale Wissensbasen, die dann vernetzt werden können, um andere Benutzer eigene Inhalte nutzen zu lassen. Folksonomies versprechen, die Wissensakquisition so einfach wie möglich zu gestalten und so viele Benutzer in den Aufbau und die Pflege einer gemeinsamen Wissensbasis einzubeziehen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    K. Aberer und Z. Despotovic. Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2001 ACM CIKM). Atlanta, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Aberer und M. Hauswirth. Semantic gossiping. In Database and Information Systems Research for Semantic Web and Enterprises, Invitational Workshop. University of Georgia, Amicalola Falls and State Park, Georgia, Apr. 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Aberer, M. Punceva, M. Hauswirth und R. Schmidt. Improving data access in P2P systems. IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 6(1):58–67, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Cimiano, A. Pivk, L. Schmidt-Thieme und S. Staab. Learning taxonomic relations from heterogeneous sources of evidence. In Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, S. 59–73. IOS Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connotea. Connotea Mailing List, 2005. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/connotea-discuss.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Decker und M. R. Frank. The networked semantic desktop. In Proc. WWW Workshop on Application Design, Development and Implementation Issues in the Semantic Web. Net York City, NY, Mai 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Ganter und R. Wille. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Giunchiglia und I. Zaihrayeu. Coordinating mobile databases. In Proc. Mobi-Quitous Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Management (P2PKM 2004). Boston, MA, USA, Aug. 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Haase, M. Ehrig, A. Hotho und B. Schnizler. Personalized information access in a bibliographic peer-to-peer system. In S. Staab und H. Stuckenschmidt (Hg.), Peer-to-Peer and SemanticWeb, Decentralized Management and Exchange of Knowledge and Information, S. 143–158. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Haase, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme und Y. Sure. Collaborative and usagedriven evolution of personal ontologies. In A. Gómez-Pérez und J. Euzenat (Hg.), ESWC, Bd. 3532 von Lecture Notes in Computer Science, S. 486–499. Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Haase, R. Siebes und F. van Harmelen. Peer selection in peer-to-peer net-works with semantic topologies. In International Conference on Semantics of a Networked World: Semantics for Grid Databases. Paris, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Haase, N. Stojanovic, Y. Sure und J. Völker. Personalized information retrieval in Bibster, a semantics-based bibliographic peer-to-peer system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 05). JUL 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund und J. Scott. Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), April 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser und H. Garcia-Molina. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In Proc. 12th International World Wide Web Conference. Budapest, Hungary, Mai 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Lehmann und R. Wille. A triadic approach to formal concept analysis. In G. Ellis, R. Levinson, W. Rich und J. F. Sowa (Hg.), Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory, Bd. 954 von Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Löser, C. Tempich, B. Quilitz, S. Staab, W. T. Balke und W. Nejdl. Searching dynamic communities with personal indexes. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins und M. A. Musen (Hg.), Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2005, Bd. 3729 von LNCS, S. 491–505. Springer-Verlag GmbH, Galway, Ireland, Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Lund, T. Hammond, M. Flack und T. Hannay. Social Bookmarking Tools (II): A Case Study — Connotea. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), April 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Mathes. Folksonomies — Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, December 2004. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediatedcommunication/folksonomies.html.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Mika. Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins und M. A. Musen (Hg.), ISWC 2005, Bd. 3729 von LNCS, S. 522–536. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, November 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Nejdl, D. Olmedilla, M. Winslett und C. C. Zhang. Ontology-based policy specification and management. In 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Bd. 3532 von Lecture Notes in Computer Science, S. 290–302. Springer, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, Mai 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Nejdl, B. Wolf, C. Qu, S. Decker, M. Sintek, A. Naeve, M. Nilsson, M. Palmer und T. Risch. EDUTELLA: A P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In Proc. 11th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002). Honolulu, Mai 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Probst, S. Raub und K. Romhardt. Wissen managen: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 4. Aufl., 2003.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Rowstron und P. Druschel. Pastry: scalable, decentraized object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In Proc. 18th IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms (Middleware). Nov. 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Schmitz. Self-organization of a small world by topic. In Proc. 1st International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Management. Boston, MA, Aug. 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Schmitz, A. Hotho, R. Jäschke und G. Stumme. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking (eingereicht). In Proc. 3rd European Semantic Web Conference. Budva, Montenegro, Juni 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Schmitz, A. Hotho, R. JÄaschke und G. Stumme. Mining association rules in folksonomies. In Proc. IFCS 2006 Conference Data Science and Classification (eingereicht). Ljubljana, Juli 2006.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Song, K. Hwang, R. Zhou und Y.-K. Kwok. Trusted p2p transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(6):24–34, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Kargver, M. F. Kaashoek und H. Balakrishnan. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In Proc. 2001 conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications (ACM SIGCOMM). ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. Stumme. A finite state model for on-line analytical processing in triadic contexts. In B. Ganter und R. Godin (Hg.), ICFCA, Bd. 3403 von Lecture Notes in Computer Science, S. 315–328. Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Tane, C. Schmitz und G. Stumme. Semantic resource management for the web: An elearning application. In Proc. 13th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004). New York, Mai 2004.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Tsui. Technologies for personal and peer-to-peer knowledge management. Techn. Ber., CSC Leading Edge Forum, Juli 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Wagner. Collaborative knowledge management: Breaking the knowledge acquisition bottleneck. In Proc. Information Resources Management Association International Conference. New Orleans, Mai 2004.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Wille. Restructuring lattices theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In I. Rival (Hg.), Ordered Sets, S. 445–470. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Schmitz
    • 1
  • Andreas Hotho
    • 1
  • Robert Jäschke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gerd Stumme
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachgebiet Wissensverarbeitung, FB 17Universität KasselKassel
  2. 2.ForschungszentrumUniversität HannoverHannover

Personalised recommendations