Emergence in Multi-Agent Systems: Cognitive Hierarchy, Detection, and Complexity Reduction part I: Methodological Issues

  • Jean-Louis Dessalles
  • Denis Phan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 564)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Axtell R. Epstein J.M., Young H.P. (2001) The Emergence of Classes in a Multi-agent Bargaining Model in Durlauf, Young eds., Social dynamics, The MIT Press, p. 191–212Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bedau, M.A. (1997) Weak Emergence, Noûs, Vol. 31, Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Mind, Causation, and World, p. 375–399Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedau, M. A.( (2002) Downward causation and the autonomy of weak emergence, Principia 6-1 June, special issue on Emergence and Downward Causation, p. 5–50Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonabeau E., Dessalles J-L. (1997) Detection and Emergence, Intellectica, 25:89–94.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonabeau, E., Dessalles, J.-L., Grumbach, A. (1995a) Characterizing emergent phenomena (1): A critical review. Rev. Int. Syst. 9 p.327–346.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonabeau, E., Dessalles, J.-L., Grumbach, A. (1995b) Characterizing emergent phenomena (2): a conceptual framework. Rev. Int. Syst. 9, p.347–369.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broch, Mare (2003) Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper Series CCPR-003-03, June.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourgine P., Nadal J.P. eds. (2004) Cognitive Economics, Spinger VerlagGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell DT (1974), Downward causation, in hierarchically organized biological systems. In: Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems, Ayala, Dobzhansky, eds. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cariani, P. (1991) Adaptivity and emergence in organisms and devices, World Futures 31, p. 49–70, Gordon & Breach Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark W.A.V (1991) Residential Preferences and Neighborhood Racial Segregation: A Test of the Schelling Segregation Model, Demography 28, p. 1–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidson, D. (1970) Mental Events, in Lawrence Foster and J. W. Swanson, eds., Experience and Theory, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davidson D. (1980) Actions and Events, Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durlauf S.N. (1997) Statistical Mechanics Approaches to Socioeconomic Behavior, in Arthur, Durlauf, Lane (eds), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Volume XXVII, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Durlauf. S.N. (2001) A Framework for the Study of Individual Behavior and Social Interactions, Sociological Methodology Volume 31 Issue 1, 1 January p. 47–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emmeche, C., Koppe, S. & Stjernfelt, F. 1997. Explaining emergence-towards an ontology of levels, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28: 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Epstein J.M. (1999) Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Science, Complexity, Vo1.4–5, p.41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferber, J., Labbani O., Muller J.-P., Bourjault. A. (1997) Formalizing emergent collective behaviours: Preliminary report. International Workshop on Decentralized Intelligent and Multi-Agent Systems, St. Petersburg, p. 113–122.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forrest S. (1990) Emergent Computation: Self-organizing, Collective, and Cooperative Phenomena in Natural and Artificial Computing Networks, in Emergent computation, MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A., 1990, p. 1–11.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Galam S., (2004), Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, in Bourgine, Nadal. eds. op. cit. p. 157–168.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galam S., Gefen Y., Shapir Y. (1982) Sociophysics: a new approach of sociological collective behavior, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gilbert N. (1995) Emergence in social simulations, in Gilbert, Conte. eds. 114–156.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gilbert N., Conte R. eds. (1995) Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life UCL Press London.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gillett C. (2002a) The Varieties of Emergence: Their Purposes, Obligations and Importance, Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol.65, p.89–115.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gillett C. (2002b) Strong Emergence as a Defense of Non-Reductive Physicalism: A Physicalist Metaphysics for ‘Downward’ Determination, Principia 6-1 June, special issue on Emergence and Downward Causation, p.83–114.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Granovetter M.S. (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91 p. 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kampis, G. (1991) Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science PergamonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim, J. (1992) Downward causation, in emergentism and nonreductive materialism, in Beckermann, Flohr, Kim, eds., Emergence or Reduction? Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim, J. (1993) Supervenience and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim, J. (1995) Emergent properties, in T. Honderich, ed. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press p. 224.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim, J. (1999) Making sense of Emergence, Philosophical Studies, 95 p.3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koehler G. Skvoretz J. (2002) Preferences and Residential Segregation: A Case Study of University Housing WPGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Langton C. (1989) Computations at the edge of chaos, Physica D, 42Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li M. Vitanyi P.M.B. (1993) An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lewes, G. H. (1874) in Emergence, Dictionnaire de la langue philosophique, Foulquié.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Leyton, M. (2001) A generative theory of shape, New York: Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McLaughlin B. P. (1992) The rise and fall of British emergentism, in Beckermann, Flohr, Kim, eds., Emergence or Reduction? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLaughlin B. P. (1997) Emergence and supervenience, Intellectica 25 p.25–43.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mill, J.S. (1843) System of Logic, Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, London.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Muller J.P. (2002) Des systèmes autonomes aux systèmes multi-agents: interactions, émergence et systèmes complexes Rapport de l’HDR, 8 novembre, 58p.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pancs, R., Vriend, N.J. (2003) Schelling’s Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited, Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 487 Queen Mary, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Phan D. (2004) From Agent-Based Computational Economics towards Cognitive Economics, in Bourgine, Nadal, eds., op.cit. p. 371–398.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Phan D., Galam S., Dessalles J.L. (2005) Emergence in multi-agent systems: cognitive hierarchy, detection, and complexity reduction part II: Axtell, Epstein and Young’s model of emergence revisited, CEF 2005, 11th International Conference on Computing in Economics and Finance, June 23–25, 2005, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rosen, R. (1978) Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems, North Holland.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ruoff G. Schneider G (2004) Segregation in the Class Room: An Empirical Test of the Schelling Model, meeting of the working group on decision theory of the German Political Science Association, University of Bamberg, July 9–10Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schelling T.S. (1969) Models of Segregation, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 59-2, p.488–493.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schelling T. S.(1971) Dynamic Models of Segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology; 1, p.143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schelling T.S. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior W.W. Norton and Co, N.Y.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Searle J.R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, Free PressGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sethi R. Somanathan R (2004), Inequality and Segregation, Journal of PoliticalEconomy p.112–6Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sperry, R. W.(1969) A modified concept of consciousness, Psychol. Rev. 76, 532–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sperry, R. W. (1986) Discussion: Macro-versus micro-determinism (A response to Klee), Philosophy of Science, 53(2), p.265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sperry, R. W. (1991) In defense of mentalism and emergent interaction, Journal of Mind and Behavior 12, p. 221–245Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tesfatsion L. (2002) Economic Agents and Markets as Emergent Phenomena, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., Vol. 99-S3, p.7191–7192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tesfatsion L. (2002b) Agent-Based Computational Economics: Growing Economies from the Bottom Up, Artificial Life, Volume 8-1, MIT Press, p.55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Van de Vijver G. (1997) Emergence et explication, Intellectica 25 p.7–23.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang J. (2004a) Residential Segregation in an All-Integrationist World, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 54, p.533,550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang J. (2004b) A Dynamic Model of Residential Segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28, p.147–170MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Louis Dessalles
    • 1
  • Denis Phan
    • 2
  1. 1.ENSTParisFrance
  2. 2.CREM, University of Rennes IFrance

Personalised recommendations