Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery

  • Mark Packer
  • I. Howard Fine
  • Richard S. Hoffman


Corneal Power Corneal Refractive Surgery Postoperative Refraction Partial Coherence Interferometry Intraocular Lens Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R et al (1998) Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 126:524–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giers U, Epple C (1990) Comparison of A-scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:235–242Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watson A, Armstrong R (1999) Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 27:49–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (2001) Use of power modulations in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:188–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC (1995) A-scan biometry and IOL implant power calculations, vol 13. Focal points. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fenzl RE, Gills JP, Cherchio M (1998) Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula. Ophthalmology 105:1759–1764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffer KJ (1994) Intraocular lens power calculation in radial keratotomy eyes. Phaco Foldables 7:6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holladay JT (1995) Understanding corneal topography, the Holladay diagnostic summary, user’s guide and tutorial. EyeSys Technologies, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Celikkol L, Pavlopoulos G, Weinstein B, Celikkol G, Feldman ST (1995) Calculation of intraocular lens power after radial keratotomy with computerized videokeratography. Am J Ophthalmol 120:739–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Speicher L (2001) Intraocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12:17–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton DR, Hardten DR (2003) Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:44–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeh WG, Koch DD (1999) Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:898–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen L, Mannis MJ, Salz JJ, Garcia-Ferrer FJ, Ge J (2003) Analysis of intraocular lens power calculation in post-radial keratotomy eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:65–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, McDonald MB (1997) Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia. Cornea 16:517–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aramberri J (2003) Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: double K method. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2063–2068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koch DD, Wang L (2003) Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2039–2042CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gills JP, Gayton JL (1998) Reducing pre-existing astigmatism. In: Gills JP (ed) Cataract surgery: the state of the art. Slack, Thorofare, NJ, pp 53–66Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nichamin L (1993) Refining astigmatic keratotomy during cataract surgery. Ocul Surg News April 15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (2001) Use of power modulations in phacoemulsification. Choo-choo chop and flip phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:188–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 16:552–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK (2002) Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:239–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS (2002) Refractive lens exchange with the array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:421–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamed AM, Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD (2002) A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in-situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 109:651–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Packer
  • I. Howard Fine
  • Richard S. Hoffman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations