World-class unconformity-related uranium deposits: Key factors for their genesis

  • M. L. Cuney

Abstract

Unconformity related uranium deposits from the Athabasca basin (Saskatchewan, Canada) represent the world largest high-grade U ore-bodies. They are located in the vicinity of an unconformity between an Archean to Paleoproterozoic basement and a Paleo- to Meso-proterozoic intracontinental clastic basin. Their exceptional grade and size results from the combined efficiency of a series of U-fractionation mechanisms, which will be reviewed here. U-enrichment of the basement is exceptional. U-extraction efficiency from source rocks is shown by the alteration of highly refractory minerals such as monazite and zircon in the sandstone, the regolith, and the basement by slightly acidic, hot (160 to 220°C, about 1kbar), oxidized and Na-Ca-Mg rich (up to 6 molar Cl) basinal diagenetic brines generated within continental, oxidized, organic free, clastic formations. Exceptional trapping conditions resulted from (i) the strong redox gradient developed between the oxidized Paleo- to Meso-Proterozoic sediments and the epicontinental Paleoproterozoic organic-rich metasediments of the basement and (ii) the creation of large openings by the combined effects of reverse faulting and intensive quartz dissolution in the sandstone. U-Pb geochronology and REE patterns of the U-oxides provide evidence for a succession of mineralization events rather than one unique ore-forming event.

Keywords

Uranium unconformity related Proterozoic metallogenesis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandre P, Kyser K (2003) In Prog. Abstracts, Uranium Geochemistry 2003 Conference, Cuney M (ed), Nancy, France, 37–40Google Scholar
  2. Annesley IR, Madore C (1991) Sask Resear Counc, Publ. R-1230-4-C-91, 140Google Scholar
  3. Annesley IR, Madore C, Cutler J (2001) Summary of Investigations 2001, Sask. Geol. Surv, Sask. En. Mines, Misc Rep 2001-4.2. 132–140Google Scholar
  4. Annesley IR, Madore C, Hajnal Z (2003) Uranium Geochemistry 2003.Conference Proceedings,Nancy, Cuney M (ed.), 55–58Google Scholar
  5. Bonhoure J, Kister P, Cuney M, Deloule E (2005) IAEA Tech, Doc., Vienna, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Brouand M, Cuney M, Deloule E (2003) Uranium Geochemistry 2003,Conference Proceedings,Nancy, Cuney M (ed.), 91–94Google Scholar
  7. Cuney M, Brouand M, Hecht L, Bruneton P (2000) GeoCanada 2000, Calgary, Conf. CD, 179Google Scholar
  8. Cuney M, Mathieu R (2001) Geology 28(8): 743–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derome D, Cuney M, Cathelineau M, Dubessy J, Bruneton P (2003) J. of Explor. Geochim. 80: 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derome D, Cuney M, Cathelineau M, Fabre C, Lhomme T (2005) Evidences of brine mixings in the McArthur River unconformity-type uranium deposit (Saskatchewan, Canada). Implications on genetic models. Econ Geol., in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson J, Chappel BW, Goleby AB (1980) in Ferguson J, Goleby AB (eds) IAEA Tech. Doc., Vienne, 73–90Google Scholar
  12. Hecht L, Cuney M (2000a) GeoCanada 2000. Calgary, Conference CD, ext. abstract, 191Google Scholar
  13. Hecht LM, Cuney (2000b) Mineralium Deposita 35: 791–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kister P, Laverret E, Quirt D, Cuney M, Patrier P, Beaufort D, Bruneton P (2005) Clays Clay Miner, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Kotzer T, Kyser TK (1995) Chem. Geol. 120: 45–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landais P (1996) Ore Geology Review 11: 33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorilleux G, Cuney M, Jebrak M, Rippert JC (2003) J. Geochem. Explor. 80: 241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall WL, Chen CTA (1982) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46: 289–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pagel M, Jaffrezic M (1977) Aspect méthodologique et importance génétique. C.R. Acad. Sci. 284: 113–116Google Scholar
  20. Raffensberger JP, Garven G (1995) The formation of unconformity-type uranium ore deposits: Coupled hydrochemical modeling. Am. J. Sci. 295: 639–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sangely, Michels R, Chaussidon M, Brouand M, Cuney M (2005) Geochim Cosmochim Acta, submittedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sibbald TII, Munday RJC Lewry JF (1976) (DUNN, C.E., Ed.); Saskatchewan Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 3: 51–98Google Scholar
  23. Wilde AR, Mernach TP, Bloom MS, Hoffman CF (1989) Economic Geology 84: 1627–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Cuney
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Unité Mixte: Géologie et Gestion des Ressources Minérales et EnergétiquesVandoeuvre les NANCY CedexFrance
  2. 2.UMR G2R 7566-CREGU-UHPVandoeuvre les NANCY CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations