Horizontal Crustal Motion Estimates for the UK inferred from GPS: Preliminary Results

  • A.I. Waugh
  • F.N. Teferle
  • R.M. Bingley
  • A.H. Dodson
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 128)

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary estimates of horizontal crustal motion inferred from a GPS network in the UK. The British Isles are on the western part of the Eurasian plate and the effects of active tectonism are expected to be small. However, the British Isles are believed to undergo non-rigid plate behaviour due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) occurring in northern Britain. Non-rigid plate behaviour can generally be shown to cause velocity biases when compared to velocities derived from models such as NNR-NUVEL-1A, which are based upon assumed rigid plate behaviour. As a first assessment, in this paper, horizontal station velocities obtained from the GPS analysis are compared to the ITRF2000 angular velocity of rigid Eurasia.

Keywords

British Isles Horizontal Crustal Motions GPS Eurasian Plate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamimi, Z., P. Sillard, and C. Boucher, ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B10), 2214, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000561, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamimi, Z., P. Sillard, and C. Boucher, The impact of a No-Net-Rotation Condition on ITRF2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1064–1068, doi: 10.1029/2002GL016279, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argus, D. F., and R. G. Gordon, No-Net-Rotation Model of Current plate Velocities Incorporating Plate Motion Model Nuvel-1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2038–2042, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D F. Argus, and S. Stein, Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversed time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys Res, Lett, 21, pp. 2191–2194, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dixon, T. H., An introduction to the Global Positioning System and some Geological Applications, Reviews of Geophysics, 29(2), 249–276, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Marotta, A. M., and R. Sabadini, Tectonic versus glacial isostatic deformation in Europe, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. McCarthy, D., (Ed) IERS Conventions, IERS Tech. Note 21, Obs. de Paris, Paris 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Stewart, M P, Ffoulkes-Jones, G H, Chen, W, Ochieng, W Y, Shardlow, P J, Penna, N T, and Bingley, R M, GPS Analysis Software (GAS) Version 2.4 User Manual, IESSG Publication, University of Nottingham, UK, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Teferle, F.N., Strategies for Long-term Monitoring of Tide Gauges using GPS, PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham (2003).Google Scholar
  10. Teferle, F.N., Bingley, R.M., Dodson, A.H., Apostilidis, P., and Staton, G., RF Interference and Multipath Effects at Continuous GPS Installations for Long — Term Monitoring of Tide Gauges in UK Harbours. (ION).Google Scholar
  11. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, New version of generic mapping tools released, Eos Trans, AGU, 76, 329, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. Williams, S. D. P., The Effect of Coloured Noise on the Uncertainties of Rates Estimated From Geodetic Time Series, Journal of Geodesy, 76(9–10), 483–494.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.I. Waugh
    • 1
  • F.N. Teferle
    • 1
  • R.M. Bingley
    • 1
  • A.H. Dodson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Surveying and Space GeodesyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations