The proposed International DORIS Service

  • Pascal Willis
  • Gilles Tavernier
  • Martine Feissel-Vernier
  • Frank Lemoine
  • Carey Noll
  • John Ries
  • Laurent Soudarin
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 128)

Abstract

In 1999, an International DORIS Experiment was initiated under the aegis of the International Association of Geodesy. Since then, 3 new DORIS satellites have been launched carrying improved Doppler receivers. In addition, the DORIS tracking network has also been steadily improved. In 2001, a DORIS analysis campaign was launched. Several groups participated using different software and providing weekly and monthly time series of results, making them available on Internet. The goal of this paper is to discuss the status of the DORIS Pilot experiment, to analyze the progress made during the past 2 years and to propose the official creation within the IAG of an International DORIS Service (IDS). Such a service would operate in conjunction with the already existing IGS, IVS and ILRS as part of the proposed International Global Geodetic Observing System (IGGOS).

Keywords

DORIS IDS International DORIS Service IGGOS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000, a new release of the International Earth Rotation System. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 107:B10 2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beutler G, Rothacher M, Schaer S, Springer TA, Kouba J, Neilan RE (1999) The International GPS Service (IGS, An interdisciplinary service in support of Earth Sciences). Adv. Space Res. 23:4 631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutler G, Brunner F, Dickey J, Feissel M, Forsberg R, Mueller II, Rummel R, Sanso F, Schwartz KP (2002) The IAG review 2000–2001: Executive Summary. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer-Verlag 125: 603–608.Google Scholar
  4. Crétaux JF, Soudarin L, Cazenave A, Bouille F (1998) Present day tectonic plate motions and crustal deformations from the DORIS space system. J. Geophys. Res. 103: 30167–30181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crétaux JF, Soudarin L, Davidson FJM, Gennero MC, Bergé-Nguyen M, Cazenave A (2002) Seasonal and interannual geocenter motion from SLR and DORIS measurements: comparison with surface loading data. J. Geophys. Res. 107.Google Scholar
  6. Davis GW, Ries JC, Tapley BD (1997) The accuracy of precise orbits computed from Doppler tracking data. J. Astr. Sci. 45:4 451–469.Google Scholar
  7. Fagard H (2003) The DORIS network, status report on renovation and collocations. IDS Analysis Workshop, IGN, Marne-la-Vallée, France, February 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Govind R, Valette JJ, Dawson J (2002) The Antarctic Sordal Glacier Experiment. IDS Workshop, Biarritz, France, June 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Haines BJ, Bertiger WIB, Desai S, Kuang D, Munson T, Young L, Willis P (2003) Initial Orbit Determination Results for Jason-l: Towards a 1-cm Orbit J. Navigation, 50:3 171–179.Google Scholar
  10. Jayles C, Berthias JP, Laurichesse D, Nordine S, Cauquil P, Tavernier G (2002) DORIS-DIODE: Two-years results of the first European Navigator. Adv Space Res 30:2 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luthcke, SB, Zelensky, NP Rowlands DD, Lemoine FG, and Williams TA (2003), The 1-cm orbit: Jason-1 precision orbit determination using GPS, SLR, DORIS and altimeter data, Marine Geod, 26:3–4, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Nothnagel A, Dill R, Feissel-Vernier M, Ferland R, Noomen R, Willis P, (2002) EOP Alignment Campaign, IDS/IGS/ILRS/IVS EOP combinations and systematic errors, IERS Workshop, Munich, Novembre 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Pavlis E.C., Mertikas SP, Evans K (2003) Sea level, tectonics, environmental monitoring and.altimeter calibration in eastern Mediterranean, EOS, Trans. AGU 84(46), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G12C-0284.Google Scholar
  14. Rummel R, Drewes H, Beutler G (2002) Integrated Global Geodetic Observing System (IGGOS): A candidate IAG project. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer-Verlag 125: 609–614.Google Scholar
  15. Schlütter, W, Hase H, Böer A, Riepl S, Cecioni A (2002) TIGO starts its operation in Concepcion in 2002, CSTG Bulletin 17: 92–93.Google Scholar
  16. Soudarin L, Crétaux JF, Cazenave A (1999) Vertical crustal motions from the DORIS space geodesy system., Geophys. Res. Lett. 26: 1207–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tapley BD, Ries JC, Davis GW, Eanes RJ, Schutz BE, Shum CK, Watkins MM, Marshall JA, Nerem RS, Putney BH, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Pavlis D, Williamson RG, and Zelensky NP (1994) Precision Orbit Determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON, J Geophys Res, 99(C12) 24383–24404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tapley BD (2002) The GRACE mission: Status and performance assessment, EOS Trans., AGU, 83:47, Fall AGU Meeting Suppl, Abstract G12B-01, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Tavernier G, Soudarin L, Larson K, Noll C, Ries J, Willis P (2002) Current status of the DORIS Pilot Experiment. Adv. Space Res. 30:2 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tavernier G, Granier JP, Jayles C, Sengenes P, Rozo F (2003) The Current Evolutions of the DORIS System. Adv. Space Res., 31:8 1947–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Willis P, Haines B, Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Muellerschoen R, Kuang D, Desai S (2003a) Topex/Jason combined GPS/DORIS orbit determination in the tandem phase. Adv. Space Res., 31:8 1941–1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willis P, Bar-Sever Y, Tavernier G (2003b) DORIS as a potential part of a Global Observing System. Springer-Verlag, Proc. IUGG General Assembly, Sapporo, July 2003, submitted to J. Geodyn.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal Willis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gilles Tavernier
    • 3
  • Martine Feissel-Vernier
    • 4
    • 5
  • Frank Lemoine
    • 6
  • Carey Noll
    • 6
  • John Ries
    • 7
  • Laurent Soudarin
    • 8
  1. 1.Direction TechniqueInstitute Géographique NationalSaint-MandéFrance
  2. 2.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadenaUSA
  3. 3.Centre National d’Etudes SpatialesToulouse Cedex 9France
  4. 4.Observatoire de ParisParisFrance
  5. 5.Institute Géographique NationalMarne-la-ValléeFrance
  6. 6.Laboratory for Terrestrial PhysicsNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 920GreenbeltUSA
  7. 7.CSRThe Univ. of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  8. 8.CLSRamonville CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations