Computational Science “Same Old Silence, Same Old Mistakes” “Something More Is Needed … ”

  • James J. Quirk
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 41)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIAA.
    Editorial policy statement on numerical accuracy and experimental uncertainty. AIAA Journal, 36, 7 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. AIIM.
    PDF-Archive Committee http://www.aiim.org/pdf_aGoogle Scholar
  3. AMRITA.
    Adaptive Mesh Refinement Interactive Teading Aid http://www.amrita-ebook.org/drink-meGoogle Scholar
  4. BC89.
    Berger, M.J., Colella, P: Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys., 82, 67–84 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. BFT.
    Babel Fish translation http://babel.altavista.comGoogle Scholar
  6. BK89.
    Bowler, K.C., Kenway, R.D., Pawley, G.S., Roweth, D., Wilson, G.V.: An introduction to OCCAM2 programming (2nd ed.). Chartwell-Brandt, Bromley, Kent (1989)Google Scholar
  7. CB97.
    Collins, T., Bicknell, D.: Crash: ten easy ways to avoid a computer disaster. Simon & Schuster, London (1997)Google Scholar
  8. Col97.
    Collins, T.: Same old silence, same old mistakes. The Daily Telegraph, London Manchester (July 15th 1997)Google Scholar
  9. CW.
    Computer Weekly. http://www.computerweekly.comGoogle Scholar
  10. CWEB.
    Knuth, D.K.: The CWEB system of structure documentation. Addison-Wesley (1994)Google Scholar
  11. DE.
    The ACM Symposium on Document Engineering http://www. documentengineering.orgGoogle Scholar
  12. DM03.
    Drummond, T., Marques, O.: The ACTS Collection, robust and high-performance tools for scientific computing, guidelines for tool inclusion and retirement. http://acts.nersc.govGoogle Scholar
  13. God59.
    Godunov, S.K.: A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of hydrodynamic equations. Math. Sbornik., 47, 271–306 (1959) English translation in U.S. Joint Publications Research Service, JPRS 7226 (1969)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Gor78.
    Gordon, J.E.: Structures, or why things don’t fall down. Penguin, London (1978)Google Scholar
  15. IMECHE.
    Institution of Mechanical Engineers http://www.imeche.org.ukGoogle Scholar
  16. IRTC.
    Intl. Ray-Tracing Competition http://www.irtc.orgGoogle Scholar
  17. Knu92.
    Knuth, D.K.: Literate Programming (1984). CLSI (Center for the Study of Language and Information) Lecture Notes 27, Stanford University (1992)Google Scholar
  18. Lan98.
    Laney, C.B.: Computational Gasdynamics. Cambridge University Press (1998)Google Scholar
  19. Mon92.
    Monaghan, J.J.: Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro. 30, 543–574 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PDF.
    PDF Reference (4 ed.) Adobe Portable Document Format version 1.5. Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, California (2003)Google Scholar
  21. PETSC.
    Balay, S., Gropp, W.D., McInnes, L.C., Smith, B.F.: Portable, Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation. Version 2.1.5, see files docs/installation/index.htm and docs/manual.pdf http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petscGoogle Scholar
  22. PH52.
    Pankhurst, R.C., Holder, D.W.: Wind tunnel technique. Pitman, London (1952)Google Scholar
  23. POVRAY.
    Persistence of Vision Ray-Tracer http://www.povray.orgGoogle Scholar
  24. PRQ92.
    Powell, K.G., Roe, P.L., Quirk, J.J.: Adaptive-mesh algorithms for computational fluid dynamics. In: Hussaini, M.Y., Kumar, A., Salas, M.D. (eds) Algorithmic trends in computational fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1992)Google Scholar
  25. Qui91.
    Quirk, J.J.: An adaptive grid algorithm for computational shock hydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield (1991).Google Scholar
  26. Qui94.
    Quirk, J.J.: A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 18, 555–574 (1994)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qui98.
    Quirk, J.J.: AMRITA-A computational facility (for CFD modelling). In: Deconinck, H. (ed) 29th Computational Fluid Dynamics. von Karman Institute, Brussels (1998)Google Scholar
  28. RAE54.
    Royal Aircraft Establishment report on the Comet investigation. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (1954) http://www.hmso.gov.ukGoogle Scholar
  29. Roa98.
    Roache, P.J.: Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Hermosa Publishing, Albuquerque (1998)Google Scholar
  30. Rob90.
    Roberts, T.W.: The behaviour of flux difference splitting schemes near slowly moving shock waves. J. Comp. Phys., 90, 141–160 (1990)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roe81.
    Roe, P.L.: Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comp. Phys., 43, 357–372 (1981)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. RPC86.
    Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (1986) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/sts51l.htmlGoogle Scholar
  33. Str91.
    Stroustrup, B.: The C++ programming language (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley (1991)Google Scholar
  34. WC84.
    Woodward, P.R., Colella, P: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comp. Phys., 54, 115–173 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. STV95.
    ICASE/LaRC workshop on adaptive grid methods (Nov. 7–9 1994). Eds. South, J.C, Thomas, J.L, Van Rosendale, J. NASA conference publication 3316 (1995)Google Scholar
  36. TEX.
    Knuth, D.K.: TEX The Program. Addison-Wesley (1986)Google Scholar
  37. Van79.
    Van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comp. Phys., 32, 101–136 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. XML.
    Extensible Markup Language (XML) http://www.w3.org/XMLGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Quirk
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Alamos National LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations