Bioethics in a Small World pp 73-91

Part of the Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 24) | Cite as

From the Corporeal to the Informational: Exploring the Scope of Benefit Sharing Agreements and their Applicability to Sequence Databases

  • Bronwyn Parry

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Parry B (2004) Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-information. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Parry B (2004) Bodily Transactions: Regulating a new space of flows in “bio-information” for inclusion. In Verdery K, Humphrey C (eds) Property in Question: Appropriation, Recognition and Value Transformation in the Global Economy Oxford, Berg Press pp. 31–58Google Scholar
  3. Hayden C (2003) When Nature Goes Public: The making and unmaking of bio-prospecting in Mexico. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dutfield G (2004) Intellectual Property, Biogenetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge: A Guide to the Issues. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Dutfield G (1996) Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. International Development Research Centre, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  6. Laird S, ten Kate K (1999) The Commercial Uses of Biodiversity. Earthscan, London 1999Google Scholar
  7. Moran K, King S, Carlson T (2001) “Biodiversity Prospecting: Lessons and Prospects” Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 30: pp. 505–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvard and China Probe Disease Genes. Science Vol 273. 19th July 1996 p. 315Google Scholar
  9. Pomfret J, Nelson D (2000) In Rural China, A Genetic Mother Lode: Harvard-Led study mined DNA riches; some donors say promises were broken” The Washington Post December 20th p. A01Google Scholar
  10. Dickson D (1998) China brings in regulations to put a stop to ‘genetic piracy’. Nature Vol, 395 No. 6697 3rd SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  11. Interim Measures for the Administration of Human Genetic Resources The Ministry of Science and Technology and The Ministry of Public Health, The People’s Republic of China. Available online at http://www.ebnic.org/interim.htmGoogle Scholar
  12. Report on the Conference Of The Parties To The Convention On Biological Diversity: Third meeting Buenos Aires, Argentina 4 to 15 November 1996 UNEP Publication, Nairobi. P. 9Google Scholar
  13. DAO 20s 1996 Philippine Implementing Rules and Regulations on the Prospecting of Biological and Genetic Resources. Available online at: http://www.psdn.org.ph/chmbio/dao20-96.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. The Andean Pact Common System on Access to Genetic Resources available online at: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~wgtrr/andpact.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. Barton J (1997) The Biodiversity Convention and the Flow of Scientific Information. In: Global Genetic Resources: Access, ownership, and intellectual property rights, edited by K. E. Hoagland and A. Y. Rossman. Washington, D.C: The Association of Systematics Research Publishers. pp. 51–56Google Scholar
  16. Fletcher L (2001) Sleeker Incyte flirts with drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology Vol.19 No. 12. pp.1092–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Corporation Press Release (1999) Genomics technology drives discovery of 140 targets and six advanced compounds in drug discovery September 19th 1999Google Scholar
  18. Goodman B (2001) Can Celera map money into genomics? Red Herring Business Magazine February 15th 2001Google Scholar
  19. Editorial “Human genomes, public and private” in Nature Vol. 409 No. 745. 15th February 2001. p.10Google Scholar
  20. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases. Publication Date: March 27, 1996 The European Union. Available online at http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property00/alternatives/directive.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Bentley L, Sherman S (2001) Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, p. 86Google Scholar
  22. Reichman J, Samuelson P (1997) Intellectual Property Rights in Data? The Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol 51. pp.50–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bronwyn Parry
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s CollegeCambridge

Personalised recommendations