Advertisement

Crossover Adjustment of New Zealand Marine Gravity Data, and Comparisons with Satellite Altimetry and Global Geopotential Models

  • M.J. Amos
  • W.E. Featherstone
  • J. Brett
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 129)

Abstract

This paper summarises the crossover adjustment of approximately 90,000-line-km of ship-track gravity observations around New Zealand. The adjustment reduced the standard deviation of the ∼106 crossovers from ∼2.0 mgal to ∼0.3 mgal. These data were then used to assess four different grids of satellite-altimeter-derived gravity anomalies. The KMS02 altimeter grid was selected for use around New Zealand as it gave a better fit to the coastal ship-track data. Least-squares collocation was then used to ‘drape’ the altimetry onto the crossover-adjusted ship-tracks to counter the well-known problems with satellite altimeter data near the coast. The precision of this merged ship-altimeter gravity dataset is estimated to be 3.5 mgal.

Keywords

Gravity marine gravimetry satellite altimetry crossover adjustment geopotential model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Trimmer R (2004) Improving high-resolution altimetric gravity field mapping (KMS02). Proc IUGG General Assembly, Sapporo, Japan 2003, Springer, Berlin, in pressGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen OB, Knudsen P (2000) The role of satellite altimetry in gravity field modelling in coastal areas, Phys Chem. Earth 25(1): 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brett J (2004) Marine gravity crossover adjustment for New Zealand, Report to Land Information New Zealand, Intrepid Geophysics, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng XL, Featherstone WE, Hwang C (2002) Estimation of contamination of ERS-2 and Poseidon satellite radar altimetry close to the coasts of Australia, Marine Geodesy 25(4): 249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denker H, Roland M (2004) Compilation and evaluation of a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe., Proc IUGG General Assembly, Sapporo, Japan 2003, Springer, Berlin, in pressGoogle Scholar
  6. Featherstone WE (2003) Comparison of different satellite altimeter-derived gravity anomaly grids with ship-borne gravity data around Australia, in: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, Dept of Surv & Geodesy, Aristotle Univ of Thessaloniki, pp.326–331Google Scholar
  7. Hwang C, Hsu H-Y, Jang R-J (2002) Global mean sea surface and marine gravity anomaly from multi-satellite altimetry: applications of deflection-geoid and inverse Vening Meinesz formulae, J Geod 76(8): 407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor RG, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96, NASA Tech rep NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  9. Moritz H (1980) Geodetic reference system 1980, Bull Geod 54(4): 395–405Google Scholar
  10. Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from GEOSAT and ERS 1 satellite altimetry, J Geophys Res 102(B5): 10039–10054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Strykowski G, Forsberg R (1998) Operational merging of satellite airborne and surface gravity data by draping techniques. in: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the Move, Springer, Berlin, 207–212Google Scholar
  12. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber Ch (2004) the gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31, L09607: doi 10.1029/2004GL019920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tscherning CC, Forsberg R, Knudsen P (1992) The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. in: Holota P, Vermeer M (eds.) Proc 1st Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Prague, May, ISBN 80-901319-2-1, pp. 327–334Google Scholar
  14. Wang YM (2001) GSFC00 mean sea surface, gravity anomaly, and vertical gravity gradient from satellite altimeter data. J Geophys Res 106(C12): 31167–31174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wessel P, Watts AB (1988) On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements, J Geophys Res 94(B4): 7685–7729Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.J. Amos
    • 1
    • 2
  • W.E. Featherstone
    • 2
  • J. Brett
    • 3
  1. 1.Land Information New ZealandWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Western Australian Centre for GeodesyCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Intrepid GeophysicsDoubleviewAustralia

Personalised recommendations