Advertisement

On the Accuracy of Vertical Deflection Measurements Using the High-Precision Digital Zenith Camera System TZK2-D

  • Christian Hirt
  • Birger Reese
  • Heinz Enslin
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 129)

Abstract

In this paper the accuracy of vertical deflections (ξ, ν) provided by the Digital Zenith Camera System TZK2-D is comprehensively analysed. During 2003 and 2004 various vertical deflections have been measured repeatedly at particular sites with different types of comparative data available. Emphasis is placed on the presentation of comparative measurements with highly accurate reference data at the Hamburg PZT station. As main result, the external accuracy level of the deflection data has been found to be about 0″.l0 – 0″.l5 as such exceeding considerably the accuracy of the formerly used photographic zenith cameras. The high accuracy level makes the Digital Zenith Camera System TZK2-D a very powerful system for highly accurate geoid determination in local areas.

Keywords

Digital Zenith Camera System Photographic Zenith Tube (PZT) vertical deflection accuracy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BIH (1984). Annual Report for 1983. Bureau International de l’Heure, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Bürki, B. (1989). Integrate Schwerefeldbestimmung in der Ivrea-Zone und deren geophysikalische Interpretation. Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, Nr. 40, Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission.Google Scholar
  3. Brockmann, E., Becker, M., Bürki, B., Gurrner, W., Haefele, P., Hirt, C., Marti, U., Müller, A., Richard, P., Schlatter, A., Schneider, D. and Wiget, A. (2004). Realization of a Swiss Combined Geodetic Network (CH-CGN). EUREF’04 Symposium of the IAG Commission 1-Reference Frames, Subcommission l-3a Europe (EUREF), Bratislava, Slovakia.Google Scholar
  4. Denker, H. (1988). Hochauflösende regionale Schwerefeldbestimmung mit gravimetrischen und topographischen Daten. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Vermessungswesen der Universität Hannover Nr. 156.Google Scholar
  5. Denker, H. (2004). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  6. Dimopoulos, T. (1982). Untersuchungen über die Genauigkeit der Ermittlung der astronomischen Refraktion. Dissertation, Fakultät Bauingenieur-und Vermessungswesen der Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  7. Enslin, H. (1964). Der Breitendienst des Deutschen Hydrographischen Institutes. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen 89: 266–279.Google Scholar
  8. Enslin, H. (1972). The Variation of Mean Latitude of the Hamburg PZT. Colloquium Nr. 1 of the IAU, La Plata, Argentina: 71–76.Google Scholar
  9. Hirt, C. (2001). Automatic Determination of Vertical Deflections in Real-Time by Combining GPS and Digital Zenith Camera for Solving the GPS-Height-Problem. Proc. 14th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation: 2540–2551, Alexandria, Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Hirt, C. (2003). The Digital Zenith Camera TZK2-D-A Modern High Precision Geodetic Instrument for Automatic Geographic Positioning in Real-Time. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 295, San Francisco: 155–159.Google Scholar
  11. Hirt, C. (2004). Entwicklung und Erprobung eines digitalen Zenitkamerasystems für die hochpräzise Lotabweichungsbestimmung. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Geodäsie und Geoinformatik der Universität Hannover Nr. 253.Google Scholar
  12. Hirt, C. and Bürki, B. (2002). The Digital Zenith Camera-A New High-Precision and Economic Astrogeodetic Observation System for Real-Time Measurement of Deflections of the Vertical. Proc. of the 3rd Meeting of the International Gravity and Geoid Commission of the International Association of Geodesy, Thessaloniki, Greece (ed. I. Tziavos): 161–166.Google Scholar
  13. Hirt, C. and Reese, B. (2004). High-Precision Astrogeodetic Determination of a Local Geoid Profile Using the Digital Zenith Camera System TZK2-D. Electronic Proc. IAG GGSM2004 Symposium, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  14. Hirt, C. and Seeber, G. (2002). Astrogeodätische Lotabweichungsbestimmung mit dem digitalen Zenitkamerasystem TZK2-D. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen 127: 388–396.Google Scholar
  15. Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., Urban, S., Corbin, T., Wycoff, G., Bastian, U., Schwekendiek, P. and Wicenec, A. (2000). The Tycho-2 Catalogue of the 2.5 Million Brightest Stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics 355: L27–L30.Google Scholar
  16. IPMS (1984). Annual Report of the International Polar Motion Service for the year 1983. Central Bureau of the IPMS, Mizusawa.Google Scholar
  17. Marti, U. (2004). High Precision combined geoid determination in Switzerland. Proc. IAG GGSM2004 Symposium, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  18. Müller, A., Bürki, B., Hirt, C., Marti, U. and Kahle, H.-G. (2004). First Results from New High-precision Measurements of Deflections of the Vertical in Switzerland. Proc. IAG GGSM2004 Symposium, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  19. Ramsayer, K. (1967). Investigation on Errors in the Determination of Astronomical Refraction. Proc. Intern. Symp. Figure of the Earth and Refraction, Wien. Published in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, Sonderheft 25: 260–269.Google Scholar
  20. Reese, B. (2004). Untersuchungen zur hochpräzisen und wirtschaftlichen Lotabweichungsbestimmung mit dem digitalen Zenitkamerasystem TZK2-D. Diploma thesis at the Institut für Erdmessung of the Universität Hannover, unpublished.Google Scholar
  21. Seeber, G. and Torge, W. (1985). Zum Einsatz transportabler Zenitkameras für die Lotabweichungsbestimmung. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen 110: 439–450.Google Scholar
  22. Torge, W. and Denker, H. (1999). Zur Verwendung des Europäischen Gravimetrischen Quasigeoids EGG97 in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen 124: 154–166.Google Scholar
  23. Wissel, H. (1982). Zur Leistungsfähigkeit von transportablen Zenitkameras bei der Lotabweichungsbestimmung. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Vermessungswesen der Universität Hannover Nr. 107.Google Scholar
  24. Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., Wycoff, G. L., Hall, D. M., Monet, D. G. and Rafferty, T. J. (2004). The Second US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2). The Astronomical Journal 127: 3043–3059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zacharias, N., Zacharias, M. I., Urban, S. E. and Høg, E. (2000). Comparing Tycho-2 astrometry with UCAC1. The Astronomical Journal 120: 1148–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Hirt
    • 1
  • Birger Reese
    • 2
  • Heinz Enslin
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für ErdmessungUniversität HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Photogrammetrie und GeolnformationUniversität HannoverHannoverGermany
  3. 3.LünenGermany

Personalised recommendations