Introducing POMME, the POtsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth

  • Stefan Maus
  • Hermann Lühr
  • Georgios Balasis
  • Martin Rother
  • Mioara Mandea

Summary

Models of the main and external field play a key role in the analysis and interpretation of satellite, airborne, marine and ground magnetic data. Here, we introduce a series of main field models with several new features: (1) External fields are parametrised in SM and GSM coordinate systems, accounting for the geometry of the ring current, the magnetosphere and the solar wind. (2) We use vector data globally, instead of the usual approach of using vector data at low latitudes and scalar data at high latitudes. (3) The angles between CHAMP's star camera and its vector magnetometer are co-estimated in a joint inversion with Ørsted data. (4) The model includes 2nd time derivatives of the magnetic field to account for the non-negligible secular acceleration in the current period of new magnetic satellite data. As inferred from the degree spectrum of the current version POMME-1.4, the secular variation is stable to degree 11 and the secular acceleration to degree 6.

Key words

geomagnetic field field models main field 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Backus G, Parker RL, and Constable C (1996) Foundations of Geomagnetism. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Constable S and Constable C (2004) Observing geomagnetic induction in magnetic satellite measurements and associated implications for mantle conductivity. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 5(1): Q01006, DOI 10.1029/2003GC000634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daglis IA, Thorne RM, Baumjohann W, and Orsini S (1999) The terrestrial ring current: Origin, formation and decay. Reviews of Geophysics 37(4): 407–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holme R, Olsen N, Rother M, and Lühr H (2003) CO2 — A CHAMP magnetic field model. In: Reigber C, Lühr H, Schwintzer P (Eds), First CHAMP Mission Results for Gravity, Magnetic and Atmospheric Studies, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg: 220–225.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lühr H, Maus S, and Rother M (2003) The noon-time electrojet, its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite. J Geophys Res 109(A1): A01306, 10.1029/2002JA009656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lühr H, Maus S, Rother M and Cooke D (2002) First in situ observation of night time F region currents with the CHAMP satellite. Geoph Res Lett 29: 10.1029/2001GL013845.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lühr H, Rother M, Maus S, Mai W, and Cooke D (2003) The diamagnetic effect of the equatorial Appleton anomaly: Its characteristics and impact on geomagnetic field modeling. Geoph Res Lett 30(17): 10.1029/2003GL017407.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maus S, Rother M, Holme R, Lühr H, Olsen N, and Haak V (2002) First scalar magnetic anomaly map from champ satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field. Geoph Res Lett 29(14): 10.1029/2001GL013685.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsen N (2002) A model of the geomagnetic main field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data. Geophys J Int 149: 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabaka TJ, Olsen N, and Langel RA (2002) A comprehensive model of the quiet-time, near-Earth magnetic field: phase 3. Geophys J Int 151: 32–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyler R, Maus S, and Lühr H (2003) Satellite observations of magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow. Science 299: 239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Maus
    • 1
  • Hermann Lühr
    • 1
  • Georgios Balasis
    • 1
  • Martin Rother
    • 1
  • Mioara Mandea
    • 2
  1. 1.GFZPotsdam
  2. 2.Institut de Physique du Globe de ParisParis

Personalised recommendations