Advertisement

Geochemical changes under variably saturated conditions during artificial recharge via ponded infiltration — A field study

  • J. Greskowiak
  • G. Massmann
  • H. Prommer
  • G. Nützmann
  • A. Pekdeger

Abstract

Artificial groundwater recharge by percolation through the unsaturated zone is an important technique to enhance the water quality for drinking water supplies. Purification of the infiltration water results mainly from microbially mediated redox-reactions that involve the degradation of a wide range of organic substances. The aim of this study was to identify the spatial and temporal distribution of the redox zones that develop beneath an artificial recharge pond, a system that is characterised by regular hydraulic changes between the saturated and unsaturated condition within every operational cycle. The most significant hydraulic changes result from the formation and removal of a clogging layer at the pond’s bottom. Geochemical analyses of suction cup water as well as oxygen and hydraulic measurements showed that generally nitrate and manganese reducing conditions dominated below the pond as long as water saturated conditions prevailed. Iron and sulphate reduction occurred only in patchily distributed zones directly below the clogging layer and resulted from chemical and physical heterogeneity. When the sediment below the clogging layer became unsaturated, atmospheric oxygen penetrated from the pond fringes into this region, allowing re-oxidation of previously formed sulphide minerals.

Keywords

artificial recharge saturated/unsaturated zone Terminal Electron Acceptor Processes (TEAPs) biodegradation redox 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agertved J, Rügge K, Barker JF (1992) Transformation of the herbicides MCPP and atrazine under natural aquifer conditions. Ground Water 30(4):500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asano T (1992) Artificial Recharge of Groundwater with Reclaimed Municipal Wastewater: Current Status and Proposed Criteria. Water Science and Technology 25(12):87–92Google Scholar
  3. Bosma TNP, Ballemans EMW, Hoekstra NK, te Welscher RAG, Smeenk JGMM, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB (1996) Biotransformation of Organics in Soil Columns and an Infiltration Area. Ground Water 34(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouwer H (2002) Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeology Journal 10(1):121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouwer H (1991) Role of groundwater recharge in treatment and storage of wastewater for reuse. Water Science and Technology 24(9):295–302Google Scholar
  6. Bouwer H (1978) Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Brun A, Broholm K (2001) Basin infiltration at Arrenæs site, Denmark: Tracer test and quality changes during aquifer passage below infiltration basins. In: Artificial recharge of groundwater, Final Report, European Commission Project ENV4-CT95-0071, pp 177–181Google Scholar
  8. Champ DR, Gulens J, Jackson RE (1979) Oxidation-reduction sequences in groundwater flow systems. Can J Earth Sci 16:12–23Google Scholar
  9. Eckert P, Appelo CAJ (2002) Hydrogeochemical modeling of enhanced benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX) remediation with nitrate, Water Resour Res 38(8):10.1029/2001WR000692Google Scholar
  10. Fujita Y, Zhou J, Orwin E, Rheinhard M, Davisson ML, Hudson GB (1998) Tracking the movement of recharge water after infiltration. In: Peters JH et al. (ed) Artificial recharge of groundwater, AA Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 155–160Google Scholar
  11. Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Massmann G, Johnston CD, Nützmann G, Pekdeger A (2005) The Impact of Variably Saturated Conditions on Hydrogeochemical Changes during Artificial Recharge of Groundwater, Applied Geochemistry, in pressGoogle Scholar
  12. Grützmacher G, Böttcher G, Chorus I, Knappe A, Pegdeker A (2002) Cyanobacterial toxins in bank filtered water from Lake Wannsee, Berlin. In: Dillon PJ (ed) Management of Aquifer Recharge for Sustainability, AA Balkema, Lisse, pp 175–179Google Scholar
  13. Hamersley MR, Howes BL (2002) Control of denitrification in a septage-treating artificial wetland: the dual role of particulate organic carbon. Wat Res 36:4415–4427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hecht H, Kölling M (2001) A low-cost optode array measuring system based on 1mm plastic optical fibers — new technique for in situ detection and quantification of pyrite weathering processes. Sensors and Actuators B 81:76–82Google Scholar
  15. Herczeg AL, Rattray KJ, Dillon PJ, Pavelic P, Barry KE (2004) Geochemical Processes During Five Years of Aquifer Storage Recovery. Ground Water 42(3):438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holm JV, Rügge K, Bjerg PL, Christensen TH (1995) Occurrence and Distribution of Pharmaceutical Organic Compounds in the Groundwater Downgradient of a Landfill (Grindsted, Denmark). Environ Sci Technol 29(5):1415–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson JS, Baker LA, Fox P (1999) Geochemical transformations during artificial groundwater charge: Soil-water interactions of inorganic constituents. Water Res 33(1):196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Långmark J, Storey MV, Ashbolt NJ, Stenstö TA (2004) Artificial groundwater treatment: biofilm activity and organic carbon removal performance. Water Res 38(1):740–748Google Scholar
  19. Lindroos AJ, Kitunen V, Derome J, Helmisaari HS (2002) Changes in dissolved organic carbon during artificial recharge of groundwater in a forested esker in Southern Finland. Water Res 36(20):4951–4958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murphy EM, Schramke JA (1998) Estimation of microbial respiration rates in groundwater by chemical modeling constrained with stable isotopes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62(21/22):3395–3406Google Scholar
  21. Pekdeger, Massmann G, Ohm B, Pühringer S, Richter D, Engemann N, Gruß S (2002) Hydrogeological-hydrogeochemical processes during bank filtration and ground water recharge using a multi tracer approach. 1st NASRI report, KompetenzZentrum Wasser Berlin, pp 14–50Google Scholar
  22. Postma D, Jakobsen R (1996) Redox zonation: equilibrium constraints on the Fe (III)/SO4-reduction interface. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3169–3175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prommer H, Stuyfzand PJ (2005) Identification of temperature-dependent water quality changes during a deep well injection experiment in a pyritic aquifer. Accepted for publication in Environ Sci and TechnolGoogle Scholar
  24. Quanrud DM, Arnold RG, Wilson LG, Gordon HJ, Graham DW, Amy GL (1996) Fate of organics during column studies of soil aquifer treatment. J Environmental Engineering 22(4):314–321Google Scholar
  25. Ray C, Melin G, Linsky RB (2002) Riverbank filtration, Water Science and Techology Library, vol 43. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. Sinke AJC, Dury O, Zobrist J (1998) Effects of a fluctuating water table: column study on redox dynamics and fate of some organic pollutants. J Cont Hydrol 33:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuyfzand PJ. (1998) Quality changes upon injection into anoxic aquifers in the Netherlands: Evaluation of 11 experiments. In: Peters JH (ed) Artificial recharge of groundwater, AA Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 283–291Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Greskowiak
    • 1
  • G. Massmann
    • 2
  • H. Prommer
    • 3
  • G. Nützmann
    • 1
  • A. Pekdeger
    • 2
  1. 1.Leibniz-Institut of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesGermany
  2. 2.Free University of BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Utrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations