Chirurgische Techniken zur Reduktion von Pankreasfisteln nach Pankreaslinksresektion — Systematisches Review und Meta-Analyse

  • Markus K. Diener
  • H. P. Knaebel
  • M. N. Wente
  • M. W. Buchler
  • C. M. Seiler
Conference paper
Part of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie book series (DTGESCHIR, volume 34)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this systematic review is to quantitatively compare surgical techniques of distal pancreatectomy regarding the frequency of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Material and methods: A systematic literature search, critical appraisal of the relevant literature, systematic review and meta-analysis (stapler-closure versus hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant) were performed. Results: Ten studies out of 262 articles fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed systematically. Quantitative analysis revealed gross variation of postoperative morbidity (13–63%) and the frequency pancreatic fistula (0–40%). Meta-analysis of stapler versus hand-sutured closure showed a non significant (P=0.24) combined odds ratio for occurrence of a pancreatic fistula of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.26) in favour of stapler-closure. Conclusions: An evidence-based approach of managing the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy is currently not available. Given the results of the meta-analysis, there is a trend in favour of the stapling technique. A larger randomised controlled trial is necessary to determine if stapling is superior to other techniques.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K (2203) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andren-Sandberg A, Wagner M, Tihanyi T, Lofgren P, Friess H (1999) Technical aspects of left-sided pancreatic resection for cancer. Dig Surg 16:305–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T, Nakajima H, Kuwano H (2003) Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 73:922–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H (1996) Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg 83:1711PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus K. Diener
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. P. Knaebel
    • 1
  • M. N. Wente
    • 1
  • M. W. Buchler
    • 1
  • C. M. Seiler
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Unfallchirurgie und PoliklinikChirurgische Universitätsklinik, Ruprecht-Karls- Universität HeidelbergHeidelberg
  2. 2.Abteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, und Unfallchirurgie, Chirurgische UniversitätsklinikUniversität HeidelbergHeidelberg

Personalised recommendations