Environmental Chemistry pp 99-106 | Cite as
The Comminution of Large Quantities of Wet Sediment for Analysis and Testing with Application to Dioxin-Contaminated Sediments from Lake Ontario
Abstract
When preparing field samples for analysis and testing, it is invariably necessary to split the sample into representative subsamples. If the mass of the original sample is of the order of 1 000 kg (dry-mass basis), then subsamples that are about 100 000–1 000 000 000 times smaller are required for chemical analysis. With such large reductions in size, the representability of the subsample is a concern. Here, a systematic method for preparing representative subsamples from large quantities of wet sediment is described. The sediment is passed through a commercially available slurry sampler that provides 1/20th splits. Further splits are obtained with a custom-built churn splitter. The procedure was applied to sediments collected from Lake Ontario, USA, and from the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA. Its efficacy was evaluated by dioxin and total-organic-carbon analy- sis for the sediments from Lake Ontario and by analysis of the ammonia contained in the pore-water of the sediments from the Fox River and Green Bay.
Key words
trace analysis dioxins organic pollutants sediments representability subsampling ammonia pore waterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allen T (1981) Particle size measurement, 3rd edn. Chapmann and Hall, London, pp 5Google Scholar
- Ankley GT, Katko A, Arthur JW (1990) Identification of ammonia as an important sediment-associated toxicant in the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:313–322Google Scholar
- Ankley GT, Lodge K, Call DJ, Balcer MD, Brooke LT, Cook PM, Kreis Jr. RG, Carlson AR, Johnson RD, Niemi GJ, Hoke RA, West CW, Giesy JP, Jones PD, Fuying ZC (1992) Integrated assessment of contaminated sediments in the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Ecotox and Env Saf 23:46–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batterman AR, Cook PM, Lodge KB, Lothenbach DB (1989) Methodology used for a laboratory determination of relative contributions of water, sediment and food chain routes of uptake for 2,3,7,8-TCDD bioaccumulation by lake trout in Lake Ontario. Chemosphere 19(1–6):451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garbaciak Jr. S, Miller JA (1995) Field demonstrations of sediment treatment technologies by the U.S. EPA’s Assessement and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) program. In: Demars KR, Richardson GN, Young RN, Chaney RC (eds) Dredging, remediation, and containment of contaminated sediments. ASTM STP 1293, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 145–154Google Scholar
- Horowitz AJ (1986) Comparison of methods for the concentration of suspended sediment in river water for subsequent chemical analysis. Environ Sci Technol 20:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keith LH (ed) (1987) Principles of environmental sampling. American Chemical Society, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Lodge KB (2002) Desorption from contaminated sediment and the organic-carbon normalized partition coefficient, KOC, for dioxin. Adv Environ Res 7:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lodge KB, Cook PM (1989) Partitioning studies of dioxin between sediment and water: the measurement of KOC for Lake Ontario sediment. Chemosphere 19(1–6):439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mudroch A, MacKnight SD (1991) CRC handbook of techniques for aquatic sediments sampling. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
- O’Keefe P, Wilson L, Buckingham C, Rafferty L (1990) Quality assurance/quality control assessment for a collaborative study of 2,3,7,8-TCDD bioaccumulation in Lake Ontario. Chemosphere 20(10–12):1277–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Onuska FI, Mudroch A, Terry KA (1983) Identification and determination of trace organic substances in sediment cores from the western basin of Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 9(2):169–182Google Scholar
- Othoudt RA, Geisy JP, Grzyb KR, Verbrugge DA, Hoke RA, Drake JB, Anderson D (1991) Evaluation of the effects of storage time on the toxicity of sediments. Chemosphere 22(9–10):801–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Timberlake DL, Garbaciak SG (1995) Bench-scale testing of selected remediation alternatives for contaminated sediments. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 45:52–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson R, Leschonski K, Alex W, Allen T, Koglin B, Scarlett B (1980) Certification report on reference materials of defined particle size, quartz (BCR No. 66, 67, 68, 69, 70). EUR 6825, Commission of The European Communities BCR InformationGoogle Scholar