Periphere Kontrolle sensorischer Signalflüsse: Datenreduktion und -selektion

  • Harald Wolf

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. [1]
    Bässler, U.: The femur-tibia control system of the stick insect — a model system for the study of the neural basis of joint control. In: Brain Res Rev 18 (1993), S. 207–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bässler, U.: The walking-(and searching-) pattern generator of stick insects, a modular system composed of reflex chains and endogenous oscillators. In: Biol. Cybern 69 (1993), S. 305–317Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Burrows, H.: Jumping and kicking in the false stick insect Prosarthria teretrirostris: kinematics and motor control. In: J Exp Biol 205 (2002), S. 1519–1530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Burrows, M.; Matheson, T.: A presynaptic gain control mechanism among sensory neurons of a locust leg proprioceptors. In: J Neurophysiol 14 (1994), S. 272–282Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Burrows, M.; Wolf, H.: The jumping “stick insect” — neurobiological and biomechanical analysis of the Prosarthria hind leg. In: Zoology 103 (2000), S. 16Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Büschges, A.; Wolf, H.: Phase-dependent presynaptic modulation of mechanosensory signals in the locust flight system. In: J Neurophysiol 81 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Büschges, A.; Wolf, H.; Jarre, F.: Presynaptic inhibition of proprioceptive afferents in the locust flight system. In: Elsner, N. (Hrsg.); Wässle, H. (Hrsg.): From membrane to mind (proceedings of the 25th Göttingen neurobiology conference) Bd. 2. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1997. — Poster 290Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    DiCaprio, R.A.; Wolf, H.; Büschges, A.: Activity-dependent decrease in the response of sensory neurons in the stick insect femoral chordotonal oragn. In: Proc. 6th International Congress of Neuroethology. Bonn, 2001Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    DiCaprio, R.A.; Wolf, H.; Büschges, A.: Activity-dependent sensitivity of proprioceptive sensory neurons in the stick insect femoral chordotonal organ. In: J Neurophysiol 88 (2002), S. 2387–2398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fischer, H.; Wolf, H.; Büschges, A.: The locust tegula: kinematic parameters and activity pattern during the wing stroke. In: J Exp Biol 20 (2002), S. 1531–1545Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H, Mittelstaedt: Reafferenzprinzip: Apologie und Kritik. In: Keidel, W.D. (Hrsg.); Plattig, U. (Hrsg.): Vorträge der Erlanger Physiologentagung, 1970, S. 161–171Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mader, W.; Ausborn, J.; Straub, O.; Stein, W.: MadSim — a tool for simulating biological neuronal networks. In: Proc. of the 29th Neurobiology Conference. Göttingen, 2003, S. 1044–1045Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rudomin, P.: Presynaptic inhibition of muscle spindle and tendon organ afferents in the mammalian spinal cords. In: TINS 13 (1990), S. 499–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Sauer, A.E.; Stein, W.; Schmitz, J.; Wolf, H.: Modulation of presynaptic inputs to chordotonal organ afferents in the stick insect by sensory and central neuronal pathways. In: Elsner, N. (Hrsg.); Eysel, U. (Hrsg.): Göttingen neurobiology report 1999 (Proc. 1st Göttingen conference of the german neuroscience society Bd. 2. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1999. — Poster 208Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Schmäh, M.; Wolf, H.: Inhibitory motor neurones supply body wall muscles in the locust abdomen. In: J Exp Biol 206 (2003), S. 445–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Stein, W.; Schmitz, J.: Multimodal convergence of presynaptic afferent inhibition in insect proprioceptors. In: J Neurophysiol 82 (1999), S. 512–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Wolf, H.; Bässler, U.; Spiess, R.; Kittmann, R.: The femur-tibia control system in a proscopiid (Caelifera, Orthoptera): a test for assumptions on functional basis and evolution of twig mimesis in stick insects. In: J Exp Biol 204 (2001), S. 3815–3828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Wolf, H.; Bässler, U.; Spiess, R.; Kittmann, R.: Neuronal basis and evolution of twig mimesis: proscopiids provide a test for hypotheses derived from studies in stick insects. In: Zoology 104 (2001), S. 10Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wolf, H.; Bässler, U.; Spiess, R.; Kittmann, R.: Twig mimesis in stick insects and proscopiids: a test case for the neuronal, cybernetic and evolutionary bases of cataleptic behaviour. In: Proc. 6th International Congress of Neuroethology. Bonn, 2001Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wolf, H.; Burrows, M.: Proprioceptive sensory neurons of a locust leg receive rhythmic presynaptic inhibition during walking. In: J Neurosci 15 (1995), S. 5623–5636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Wolf, H.; Büschges, A.: Dynamic synaptic arrangement in sensory-motor pathways of the adult locust flight system. In: Naturwissenschaften 84 (1997), S. 234–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Wolf, H.; Büschges, A.: Plasticity of synaptic connections in sensory-motor pathways of the locust flight system. In: J Neurophysiol 78 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Wolf, H.; Harzsch, S.: The neuromuscular system in the walking legs of a scorpion. 1. Arrangement of muscles and excitatory innervation. In: Arthropod Structure and Development 31 (2002), S. 185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Wolf, H.; Harzsch, S.: The neuromuscular system in the walking legs of a scorpion: muscle arrangement and (inhibitory) innervation. In: Zoology 105 (2002), S. 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wolf, H.; Harzsch, S.: The neuromuscular system in the walking legs of a scorpion. 2. Inhibitory motoneurons. In: Arthropod Structure and Development 31 (2003), S. 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wolf, H.; Wehner, R.: Pinpointing food sources: olfactory and anemotactic orientation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. In: J Exp Biol 203 (2000), S. 857–858PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harald Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung NeurobiologieUniversität UlmUlm

Personalised recommendations