Key-problems and key-methods in computational geometry

  • Herbert Edelsbrunner
Invited Lectures
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 166)

Abstract

Computational geometry, considered a subfield of computer science, is concerned with the computational aspects of geometric problems. The increasing activity in this rather young field made it split into several reasonably independent subareas. This paper presents several key-problems of the classical part of computational geometry which exhibit strong interrelations. A unified view of the problems is stressed, and the general ideas behind the methods that solve them are worked out.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AHU]
    Aho, A.V., Hopcroft, J.E., and Ullman, J.D. The design and analysis of computer algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
  2. [Br]
    Brown, K.Q. Geometric transforms for fast geometric algorithms. Ph.D.Thesis, Rep. CMU-CS-80-101, Dep.Comp.Sci., Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1980.Google Scholar
  3. [CSY]
    Cole,R., Sharir,M., and Yap,C.K. Convex k-hulls and related problems. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. [E]
    Edelsbrunner, H. Intersection problems in computational geometry. Ph.D.Thesis, Rep.F93, Inst.Inf.Proc., Tu Graz, Austria, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. [EGS]
    Edelsbrunner,H., Guibas,L.J., and Stolfi,J. Optimal point location in a monotone subdivision. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. [EOS]
    Edelsbrunner,H., O'Rourke,J., and Seidel,R. Constructing arrangements of lines and hyperplanes with applications. Proc. 24th Ann. Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. (1983), 83–91.Google Scholar
  7. [EW]
    Edelsbrunner, H. and Welzl, E. Halfplanar range search in linear space and O(n0.695) query time. Rep.Flll, Inst.Inf.Proc., Tu Graz, Austria, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. [Gr]
    Graham,R.L. An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set. Inf. Proc. Lett. (1972), 132–133.Google Scholar
  9. [G]
    Gruenbaum, B. Convex polytopes. Pure and applied math. XVI, Interscience, London, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. [K]
    Kirkpatrick, D.G. Optimal search in planar subdivisions. SIAM J. Comp. 12 (1983), 28–35.Google Scholar
  11. [KS]
    Kirkpatrick,D.G. and Seidel,R. The ultimate planar convex hull algorithm? Proc. 20th Ann.Allerton Conf. Comm., Contr., Comp. (1982), 35–42.Google Scholar
  12. [Kn]
    Knuth, D.E. Retrieval on secondary keys. Chapter 6.5 in Knuth, D.E.: Sorting and searching — the art of computer programming III. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
  13. [L]
    Lee, D.T. On k-nearest neighbor Voronoi diagrams in the plane. IEEE Trans. Comp. C-31 (1982), 478–487.Google Scholar
  14. [LT]
    Lipton,R.J. and Tarjan,R.E. Application of a planar separator theorem. Proc. 18th Ann. Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. (1977), 162–170.Google Scholar
  15. [LP]
    Lozano-Perez, T. Spatial planning: a configuration space approach. IEEE Trans. Comp. C-32 (1983), 108–120.Google Scholar
  16. [M]
    Megiddo,N. Linear-time algorithms for linear programming in R3 and related problems. Proc. 23rd Ann. Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. (1982), 329–338.Google Scholar
  17. [NP]
    Nievergelt, J. and Preparata, F.P. Plane-sweep algorithms for intersecting geometric figures. Comm. ACM 25 (1982), 739–747.Google Scholar
  18. [O1]
    Overmars,M.H. The design of dynamic data structures. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 156, Springer, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. [O2]
    Overmars, M.H. The locus approach. Rep. RUU-CS-83-12, Dep.Comp.Sci., Univ. Utrecht, the Netherlands, 1983.Google Scholar
  20. [PH]
    Preparata, F.P. and Hong, S.J. Convex hulls of finite sets of points in two and three dimensions. Comm. ACM 20 (1977), 87–93.Google Scholar
  21. [Sch]
    Schmitt, A. On the time and space complexity of certain exact hidden line algorithms. Rep. 24/81, Fak.Inf., Univ. Karlsruhe, Germany, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. [S]
    Seidel, R. A convex hull algorithm optimal for point sets in even dimensions. Rep. 81-14, Dep.Comp.Sci., Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. [Sh]
    Shamos, M.I. Computational geometry. Ph.D.Thesis, Dep.Comp.Sci., Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn., 1978.Google Scholar
  24. [ShH]
    Shamos,M.I. and Hoey,D. Closest-point problems. Proc. 16th Ann. Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. (1975), 151–162.Google Scholar
  25. [V]
    Voronoi, G. Sur quelques proprietes des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. J. reine angew. Math. 133 (1907), 97–178.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Edelsbrunner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institutes for Information Processing Technical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations